Payne v. Peralta Community College District

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Northern District Payne v. Peralta Community College District

Payne v. Peralta Community College District

Plaintiff:	Janice Payne
Defendant:	Peralta Community College District
Case Number:	3:2016cv04390
Filed:	August 4, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office:	San Francisco Office
County:	Alameda
Presiding Judge:	Maria-Elena James
Nature of Suit:	Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 26, 2019	Filing 59 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Plaintiff having advised the Court that the parties have agreed to a settlement of all remaining claims, specifically, her claims for damages and for attorney's fees, it is ordered that plaintiff's remaining claim s alleged against defendant be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereof on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said sett lement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings as appropriate. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 26, 2019. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2019)
October 23, 2018	Filing 30 AMENDED CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ONLY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 23, 2018. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2018)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 26, 2019

Filing 59 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Plaintiff having advised the Court that the parties have agreed to a settlement of all remaining claims, specifically, her claims for damages and for attorney's fees, it is ordered that plaintiff's remaining claim s alleged against defendant be dismissed without prejudice; provided, however, that if any party shall certify to this Court, within ninety days, with proof of service of a copy thereof on opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said sett lement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar for further proceedings as appropriate. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 26, 2019. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2019)

October 23, 2018

Filing 30 AMENDED CONSENT DECREE AND ORDER FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ONLY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 23, 2018. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Payne v. Peralta Community College District
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janice Payne
Represented By:	Celia Louise McGuinness
Represented By:	Paul Leslie Rein
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Peralta Community College District
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?