Ripple Labs, Inc. v. Pixel Labs, Inc. et al
| Ripple Labs, Inc. and Ripple Labs, Inc. a Delaware Corporation doing business as Ripple |
| Pixel Labs, Inc, Pixel Labs, Inc. and Razmig Hovaghimian |
| 4:2016cv04788 |
| August 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Joseph C Spero |
| Jon S Tigar |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1051 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 31
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE WITH THE COURT'S RETAINING JURISDICTION TO ENFORCE THE SETTLEMENT AND COEXISTENCE AGREEMENT re #29 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Ripple Labs, Inc.. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 28, 2016. (Attachments: #(1) Exhibit A)(wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2016)
|
| Filing 30 [Proposed] Order Granting re #29 Joint Motion For Dismissal With Prejudice With The Court's Retaining Jurisdiction to Enforce The Settlement And Coexistence Agreement filed by Ripple Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: #(1) Exhibit A)(Gordon, Lawrence) (Filed on 11/18/2016) |
| Filing 29 Joint Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice With The Court's Retaining of Jurisdiction To Enforce The Settlement and Coexistence Agreement filed by Ripple Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: #(1) Exhibit A, #(2) Exhibit B)(Gordon, Lawrence) (Filed on 11/18/2016) |
|
Filing 28
ORDER TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL re #27 Notice of Tentative Settlement filed by Pixel Labs, Inc., Razmig Hovaghimian. Dismissal or Statement due by 12/19/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/11/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 7, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2016)
|
| Filing 27 NOTICE by Razmig Hovaghimian, Pixel Labs, Inc. of Tentative Settlement (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ghajar, Bobby) (Filed on 11/7/2016) |
|
Filing 26
ORDER by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting #24 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2016)
|
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Statement of Non-Opposition to re #24 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to re #1 Complaint filed by Razmig Hovaghimian, Pixel Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support)(Related document(s) #24 ) (Peterson, Marcus) (Filed on 10/24/2016) |
| Filing 24 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer to re #1 Complaint filed by Razmig Hovaghimian, Pixel Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: #(1) Declaration of Marcus D. Peterson in Support of Second Motion to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint, #(2) Proposed Order)(Peterson, Marcus) (Filed on 10/20/2016) |
| Filing 23 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Ripple Labs, Inc. of Standing Orders (Gordon, Lawrence) (Filed on 10/6/2016) |
| Filing 22 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 12/30/2016. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/11/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Standing Order for All Judges of the Northern District) (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/6/2016) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Hon. Jon S. Tigar for all further proceedings. Judge Hon. Charles R. Breyer no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 10/5/16. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2016)
|
|
Filing 20
ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/5/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2016)
|
| Filing 19 CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER and STANDING ORDERS: Initial Case Management Conference set for 11/18/2016 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 11/11/2016. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2016) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Hon. Charles R. Breyer for all further proceedings. Judge Joseph C Spero no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/26/16. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2016)
|
| Filing 17 DISREGARD THIS ENTRY. CLERKS ERROR...ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Hon. Charles R. Breyer for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 9/23/16. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2016) Modified on 9/26/2016 (as, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2016) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2016)
|
| Filing 14 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ripple Labs, Inc... (Gordon, Lawrence) (Filed on 9/22/2016) |
| Filing 13 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ripple Labs, Inc. (Gordon, Lawrence) (Filed on 9/22/2016) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by John Paul Oleksiuk (Oleksiuk, John) (Filed on 9/20/2016) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, filed by Razmig Hovaghimian, Pixel Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of JP Olekisuk in Support of Motion to Extend Time to Answer, #2 Proposed Order)(Peterson, Marcus) (Filed on 9/20/2016) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address by Lawrence Scott Gordon (Gordon, Lawrence) (Filed on 9/14/2016) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ripple Labs, Inc. re #5 Summons Issued to Razmig Hovaghimian (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Gordon, Lawrence) (Filed on 9/14/2016) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ripple Labs, Inc. re #5 Summons Issued to Pixel Labs, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Gordon, Lawrence) (Filed on 9/14/2016) |
| Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiff shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge Consent/Declination due by 9/22/2016. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 9/22/2016. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2016) |
| Filing 6 REPORT on the filing of an action regarding Trademark Infringement. (cc: form mailed to register). (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2016) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Razmig Hovaghimian, Pixel Labs, Inc.. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2016) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 11/11/2016. Case Management Conference set for 11/18/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2016) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 9/2/2016. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2016) |
| Filing 2 Proposed Summons. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Gordon, Lawrence) (Filed on 8/19/2016) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, and Cybersquatting; Demand for Jury Trial against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 400.00, receipt number 0971-10703080.). Filed by Ripple Labs, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gordon, Lawrence) (Filed on 8/19/2016) Modified on 8/22/2016 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
