Freeman v. Ow

Appellant: George Anthony Freeman
Appellee: Alan Albert Henry Ow
Case Number: 3:2016cv04817
Filed: August 23, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Jon S. Tigar
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28:0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
May 17, 2017 14 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 17, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2017)
November 16, 2016 9 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY BANKRUPTCY PENDING APPEAL by Judge Jon S. Tigar; denying 3 Motion to Stay. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2016)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Freeman v. Ow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: George Anthony Freeman
Represented By: Jamin Price Horn
Represented By: Bruce Emerson Methven
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Alan Albert Henry Ow
Represented By: Dena Rosenberg Thaler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?