Jenkins v. Aerotek, Inc et al
| Avalita Jenkins, Tracey Jenkins and Samuel Williams |
| Aerotek, Inc, Sutter Home Winery, Inc. and Trinchero Family Estates |
| 3:2016cv05000 |
| August 31, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL re 52 filed by Tracey Jenkins, Samuel Williams, Avalita Jenkins. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/20/17. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2017)
|
|
Filing
40
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 39 to Continue Case Management Deadlines filed by Sutter Home Winery, Inc. Discovery due by 9/29/2017. Status Report due by 10/5/2017. Dispositive Motion Hearing set for 11/9/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Status Conference set for 10/12/2017 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/6/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2017)
|
|
Filing
33
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re: Confidentiality Agreement and Consent Protective Order filed by Aerotek, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/1/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
