Glaze v. Ducart
Petitioner: Jason Wesley Glaze
Respondent: C. Ducart
Case Number: 4:2016cv05144
Filed: September 7, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: Del Norte
Presiding Judge: PSLC RMH
Presiding Judge: Kandis A. Westmore
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER by Judge James Donato granting 22 Motion to Continue. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2018)
January 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER by Judge James Donato granting in part and denying in part 17 Motion to Dismiss. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2018)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Glaze v. Ducart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jason Wesley Glaze
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: C. Ducart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?