Moralez v. Little Madfish
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|April 26, 2017
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 4/26/2017. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2017)
|February 6, 2017
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 2/16/2017 11:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 2/9/2017. The plaintiff filed a complaint against the defendant on September 26, 2016. (Complaint, ECF No. 1.) Under the scheduling order a t ECF No. 3, the date for completing service was November 25, 2016. Because the plaintiff did not file proof of service, on December 30, 2016 the court asked for an update by January 6, 2017. (ECF No. 7.) After receiving no word, the court again aske d the plaintiff to update the court about service no later than February 2, 2017. (ECF No. 8.) On both occasions, the court warned that absent a showing of good cause, failing to timely serve a case can result in the case being dismissed without prej udice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). To date, the plaintiff has filed no proof that the defendant has been served or provided an explanation about why there is good cause for not serving it. (See generally Docket.) Accordingly, the co urt sets a hearing on February 16, 2017, at 11 a.m., for the plaintiff to show cause why the case should not be dismissed under Rule 4(m) without prejudice for failure to serve the defendant. The plaintiff must file a written response by February 9, 2017. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 2/6/2017)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?