Howard Rydolph v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Howard Rydolph |
Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax, Inc., Ally Financial, Inc., Military Star, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and WebBank |
3:2016cv05694 |
October 5, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Francisco |
William Alsup |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 JUDGMENT in favor of defendants and against plaintiff Howard Rydolph. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 4/13/2017. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/13/2017) |
Filing 61 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge William Alsup [granting 57 Motion to Dismiss]. Amended Pleadings due by NOON on 4/11/2017. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2017) |
Filing 55 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Motions due by 2/9/2017. Responses due by 2/23/2017. Replies due by 3/2/2017. Motion Hearing set for 3/23/2017 08:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William Alsup. Signed by Judge Alsup on 1/23/2017. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2017) |
Filing 54 ORDER APPROVING 50 STIPULATION TO DISMISS WEBBANK WITH PREJUDICE by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2017) |
Filing 28 ORDER APPROVING 27 STIPULATION TO DISMISS WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., WITH PREJUDICE by Hon. William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.