Fisher v. Enterprise Rent-a-Car Company of Los Angeles
Plaintiff: Keana Fisher
Defendant: Enterprise Rent-a-Car Company of Los Angeles
Case Number: 3:2016cv05882
Filed: October 11, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Riverside
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 17 Motion to Transfer Case. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2016)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fisher v. Enterprise Rent-a-Car Company of Los Angeles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keana Fisher
Represented By: Mark Samuel Greenstone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Enterprise Rent-a-Car Company of Los Angeles
Represented By: Benjamin Juhyeok Kim
Represented By: Melissa K. Zonne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?