Center For Biological Diversity et al v. Fish and Wildlife Services of the United States et al
| Center For Biological Diversity, Environmental Protection Information Center, Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center and Sierra Forest Legacy |
| U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Sally Jewell and Daniel M. Ashe |
| 4:2016cv06040 |
| October 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Thelton E. Henderson |
| Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 16 U.S.C. ยง 1538 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
ORDER DENYING 114 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION. Signed by Judge Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/3/2019)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER APPROVING 112 STIPULATED FEE AGREEMENT. Signed by Judge William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2019)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER GRANTING 98 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO COMPLY AND ORDER VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge William Alsup. (whalc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2019)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER GRANTING IN PART 86 MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT AND VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge William Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2018)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (granting in part 55 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 57 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 58 Motion for Summary Judgment). Signed by Judge Alsup. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/21/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
