Gatchalian v. Equifax, Inc. et al
Glennda Gatchalian |
Equifax, Inc. and Asset Acceptance, LLC |
3:2016cv06334 |
November 1, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
San Francisco |
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 59 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying as Moot 51 Motion to Dismiss. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2017) |
Filing 47 ORDER REGARDING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINTS; BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO DISMISS; VACATING STAY; DENYING STIPULATIONS AS MOOT; AND VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE IN CASE NO. 17-CV-0416. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 4/12/17. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2017) |
Filing 39 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ;granting 17 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs response filed within seven days of this Order. Case temporarily stayed until briefing completed. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2017) |
Filing 26 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying defendant Equifax, Inc.'s 18 Motion to Consolidate Cases. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2017) |
Filing 16 ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/15/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2016) |
Filing 12 ORDER RE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT re 10 Clerk's Notice. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 11/23/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/23/2016) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.