Metter v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Julian Metter |
Uber Technologies, Inc. |
3:2016cv06652 |
November 16, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Los Angeles |
Elizabeth D. Laporte |
Other Fraud |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 147 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION, FOLLOWING EVIDENTIARY HEARING by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 105 Motion to Compel.(tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2019) |
Filing 94 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 93 to Amend Complaint & to Dismiss Plaintiff Metter filed by Julian Metter. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/14/18. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2018) |
Filing 89 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 88 TO CONTINUE APRIL 11, 2018 BENCH TRIAL. Bench Trial previously set for 4/11/18 has been continued to 10/26/2018 at 09:30 AM before Judge Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/10/18. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2018) |
Filing 43 ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg denying 40 Uber's Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2017) |
Filing 39 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT UBER'S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION by Judge Richard Seeborg, denying 25 Motion to Compel. (dl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2017) |
Filing 21 STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint and Briefing Schedule. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/9/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2017) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.