Johnson v. Security Owners Corporation

Plaintiff: Scott Johnson
Defendant: Security Owners Corporation
Case Number: 3:2016cv06657
Filed: November 17, 2016
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42:12101
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 7, 2017 11 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION AND ORDER to Extend Site Inspection Deadline. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/7/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2017)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Security Owners Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scott Johnson
Represented By: Teresa Denise Allen
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr.
Represented By: Phyl Grace
Represented By: Russell Clive Handy
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Security Owners Corporation
Represented By: Jason G. Gong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?