Fishon v. Premier Nutrition Corporation
Plaintiff: Eric Fishon
Defendant: Premier Nutrition Corporation
Case Number: 3:2016cv06980
Filed: December 5, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Richard Seeborg
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 346 ORDER GRANTING 328 RENEWED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on August 7, 2023. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2023)
October 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 320 ORDER by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg DENYING 302 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW; DENYING 304 MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL; and GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 296 MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES. Signed on October 18, 2022. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2022)
September 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 299 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND BILL OF COSTS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/7/2022. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2022)
August 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 293 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DECERTIFY, AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Chief Judge Seeborg on 8/12/2022. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2022)
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 244 ORDER ON DEPOSITION DESIGNATION OBJECTIONS. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/26/2022. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2022)
May 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 240 ORDER ON ADDITIONAL MOTIONS IN LIMINE. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/24/2022. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2022)
May 19, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 231 ORDER ON ADDITIONAL MOTIONS IN LIMINE. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/19/2022. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2022)
May 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 215 ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/9/2022. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2022)
April 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 180 ORDER ON MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY AND MOTION TO DECERTIFY CLASS. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/26/2022. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2022)
March 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND GRANTING MOTION TO APPOINT CLASS REPRESENTATIVE. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/30/2022. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2022)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fishon v. Premier Nutrition Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eric Fishon
Represented By: Timothy G. Blood
Represented By: Leslie E. Hurst
Represented By: Thomas Joseph O'Reardon, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Premier Nutrition Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?