Fishon v. Premier Nutrition Corporation
| Eric Fishon |
| Premier Nutrition Corporation |
| 3:2016cv06980 |
| December 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
362
ORDER REOPENING CASE, VACATING JUDGMENT IN PART, AND SETTING SCHEDULE. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on November 22, 2024. (rslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2024)
|
|
Filing
346
ORDER GRANTING 328 RENEWED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on August 7, 2023. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2023)
|
|
Filing
320
ORDER by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg DENYING 302 MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW; DENYING 304 MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL; and GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 296 MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES. Signed on October 18, 2022. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/18/2022)
|
|
Filing
299
STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND BILL OF COSTS. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 9/7/2022. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2022)
|
|
Filing
293
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DECERTIFY, AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by Chief Judge Seeborg on 8/12/2022. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2022)
|
|
Filing
244
ORDER ON DEPOSITION DESIGNATION OBJECTIONS. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/26/2022. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2022)
|
|
Filing
240
ORDER ON ADDITIONAL MOTIONS IN LIMINE. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/24/2022. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2022)
|
|
Filing
231
ORDER ON ADDITIONAL MOTIONS IN LIMINE. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/19/2022. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2022)
|
|
Filing
215
ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 5/9/2022. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2022)
|
|
Filing
180
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY AND MOTION TO DECERTIFY CLASS. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/26/2022. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2022)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND GRANTING MOTION TO APPOINT CLASS REPRESENTATIVE. Signed by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg on 3/30/2022. (rslc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2022)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fishon v. Premier Nutrition Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eric Fishon | |
| Represented By: | Timothy G. Blood |
| Represented By: | Leslie E. Hurst |
| Represented By: | Thomas Joseph O'Reardon, II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Premier Nutrition Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
