Levi Strauss & Co. v. Blue in Green, LLC et al
| Levi Strauss & Co. |
| Blue in Green, LLC, Studio D'Artisan International Co., LTD., Full Count Co., Ltd. and Samurai Co., Ltd. |
| 3:2016cv07011 |
| December 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| William H. Orrick |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
67
ORDER GRANTING ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge William H. Orrick re: 62 Motion for Default Judgment. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2018)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. In the event plaintiff files its motion for default judgment against Full Count by noon on Tuesday, May 29, 2018, the Case Management Conference set at 2:00 p.m. that day shall be vacated and counsel need not appear. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 05/25/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2018)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER granting 22 STIPULATION to Continue Case Management Conference and to Extend Time for Defendant to Respond to Complaint. Case Management Statement due by 3/28/2017. Case Management Conference continued to 4/4/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 02/23/2017. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/23/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
