Stevens et al v. Jiffy Lube International, Inc.
Randy Stevens and Elissa Stevens |
Jiffy Lube International, Inc. |
3:2016cv07175 |
December 15, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Sonoma |
Sallie Kim |
Arbitration |
09 U.S.C. ยง 0010 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying 25 29 Petitioners' Motion for New Judgment, or in the Alternative, to Alter or Amend the Judgment. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2017) |
Filing 31 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 30 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 29 MOTION for New Judgment.< Motion Hearing reset from 4/13/2017 to 5/4/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/20/17. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2017) |
Filing 23 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying 2 Plaintiffs' Motion for Vacatur of Arbitration Award. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2017) |
Filing 22 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 Case Management Scheduling Order and 2 MOTION to Vacate 1 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award Arbitraiton Award. Motion Hearing reset for 4/6/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Fran cisco before Edward M. Chen. Case Management Statement due by 3/30/2017. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 4/6/2017 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/6/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2017) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.