Andrews v. California Department of Consumer Affairs et al
Plaintiff: Mark T. Andrews
Defendant: California Department of Consumer Affairs, Sonoma County Department of Child Support Services, California Department of Motor Vehicles and California Bureau of Automotive Repair
Case Number: 4:2017cv00252
Filed: January 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: Oakland Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Donna M. Ryu
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER GRANTING 80 , 83 , 85 MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/26/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2018)
December 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER by Judge William H. Orrick granting 48 , 49 , 51 Motions to Dismiss. Defendants' motions to dismiss are granted without prejudice. Andrews has 30 days to amend his complaint. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2017)
November 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER granting 56 STIPULATION continuing hearing as to 48 MOTION to Dismiss, 49 MOTION to Dismiss, and 51 MOTION to Dismiss to 12/13/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Judge William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/20/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2017)
September 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge William H. Orrick re 13 , 17 , 21 , 23 Motions to Dismiss. Andrews is granted leave to amend within 30 days from the date of this order. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2017)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andrews v. California Department of Consumer Affairs et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark T. Andrews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Consumer Affairs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sonoma County Department of Child Support Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Department of Motor Vehicles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Bureau of Automotive Repair
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?