Andrews v. California Department of Consumer Affairs et al
Mark T. Andrews |
California Department of Consumer Affairs, Sonoma County Department of Child Support Services, California Department of Motor Vehicles and California Bureau of Automotive Repair |
4:2017cv00252 |
January 17, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
Alameda |
Donna M. Ryu |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 92 ORDER GRANTING 80 , 83 , 85 MOTIONS TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/26/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/26/2018) |
Filing 69 ORDER by Judge William H. Orrick granting 48 , 49 , 51 Motions to Dismiss. Defendants' motions to dismiss are granted without prejudice. Andrews has 30 days to amend his complaint. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2017) |
Filing 57 ORDER granting 56 STIPULATION continuing hearing as to 48 MOTION to Dismiss, 49 MOTION to Dismiss, and 51 MOTION to Dismiss to 12/13/2017 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Judge William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/20/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2017) |
Filing 38 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge William H. Orrick re 13 , 17 , 21 , 23 Motions to Dismiss. Andrews is granted leave to amend within 30 days from the date of this order. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2017) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.