Berlanga et al v. Equilon Enterprises LLC et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|August 31, 2017
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 31, 2017. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2017)
|July 31, 2017
ORDER AFFORDING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY; CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. No later than August 11, 2017, plaintiffs shall file a surreply, not to exceed five pages in le ngth. The hearing on defendants' motion to dismiss is continued from August 4, 2017, to August 25, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. The Case Management Conference is continued from September 15, 2017, to September 29, 2017, at 10:30 a.m.; a Joint Case Management Conference shall be filed no later than September 22, 2017. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 31, 2017. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2017)
|April 26, 2017
ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION; AFFORDING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO AMEND; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The complaint is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. If plaintiffs wish to file an a mended complaint, plaintiffs shall file such pleading no later than May 19, 2017. The Case Management Conference is continued rom May 5, 2017, to June 30, 2017, at 10:30 a.m. A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than June 23, 2017. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 26, 2017. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/26/2017)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?