Jessilyn Manimbao v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al
Jessilyn Manimbao |
Experian Information Solutions, Inc., TransUnion, Inc. and First Electronic Bank |
4:2017cv00394 |
January 25, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Jon S. Tigar |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 48 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 47 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER (for dismissal of Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc.) filed by Jessilyn Manimbao. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on September 18, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2017) |
Filing 34 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 33 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER (for dismissal of Defendant First Electronic Bank) filed by Jessilyn Manimbao.. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 1, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2017) |
Filing 31 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 30 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE filed by TransUnion, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 27, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2017) |
Filing 19 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 JOINT STIPULATION WITH [PROPOSED] ORDER for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Experian Information Solutions, Inc.. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 7, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/7/2017) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.