Bilbo v. County of Alameda, California et al
| Pamela Saucer Bilbo |
| County of Alameda, California, City of Oakland, California and John P. Williams |
| 3:2017cv00932 |
| February 23, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Contra Costa |
| Jon S. Tigar |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 67 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re Stipulated Protective Order filed by John P. Williams, County of Alameda, California. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 27, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2018)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting in part and denying in part 19 Motion to Dismiss. Amended Pleadings due by 9/29/2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2017)
|
|
Filing
53
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 52 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT WILLIAMS TIME TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE filed by John P. Williams, County of Alameda, California. Case Management Statement due by 9/11/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/20/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 31, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
