Rodriguez et al v. Credico (USA) LLC et al
Plaintiff: Rodriguez, Mante Rodriguez, Crystal Hamilton Peterson, Valerie Morales and Deandre Stovall
Defendant: Credico (USA) LLC, Red Tower Marketing, Inc. and Diana Rojas
Interested Party: Tashian Scott
Case Number: 3:2017cv01221
Filed: March 8, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Alameda
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 6, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ORDER granting re #103 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Settlement Approval. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 06/06/2018. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2018)
June 1, 2018 Filing 103 MOTION for Settlement Approval (Unopposed) filed by Valerie Morales, Crystal Hamilton Peterson, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall. Motion Hearing set for 7/12/2018 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 6/15/2018. Replies due by 6/22/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Settlement Agreement, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 6/1/2018)
May 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 102 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #101 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2018)
May 16, 2018 Filing 101 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney of Matthew Carlson filed by Valerie Morales, Crystal Hamilton Peterson, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall. Responses due by 5/30/2018. Replies due by 6/6/2018. (Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 5/16/2018)
May 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 100 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #99 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2018)
May 11, 2018 Filing 99 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney for Jill Kahn filed by Valerie Morales, Crystal Hamilton Peterson, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall. Responses due by 5/25/2018. Replies due by 6/1/2018. (Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 5/11/2018) Modified on 5/25/2018 (fabS, COURT STAFF).
March 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER re motions at ECF Nos. #38 , #56 , #75 , #89 .The court understands that the parties settled their case. In light of this, and as an administrative matter, the court terminates the pending motions. If the landscape changes, the parties may notify the court in a joint statement, and the court will issue an order on the motions. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 3/28/2018)
March 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 97 ORDER terminating #95 Motion.For administrative reasons, and because it treats the motion as the opposition to the summary-judgment motion, the court terminates the motion to defer (and thus vacates the 4/26/2018 hearing that resulted from the filing of the motion). (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 3/23/2018)
March 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER. The court usually sees a Rule 56(d) argument raised in an opposition to a summary-judgment motion. Filing it as a stand-alone motion to defer triggered a different briefing schedule. For now, in the interest of case-management efficiency, the court will treat the stand-alone motion to defer as an opposition. Credico may file its reply to the motion/opposition on April 2 (but if it files it earlier, that is fine too). This process will keep the case on the existing schedule, If the court determines that it needs additional briefing, it will advise the parties after it reads Credico's reply. (As an update to the parties, the court is working on the other motions.) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 3/23/2018)
March 21, 2018 Filing 95 MOTION to Defer Consideration of Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(D) re #89 MOTION for Summary Judgment or in the alternative summary adjudication filed by Valerie Morales, Crystal Hamilton Peterson, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall. Motion Hearing set for 4/26/2018 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 4/4/2018. Replies due by 4/11/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Jill Kahn, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 3/21/2018)
March 15, 2018 Filing 94 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler: Initial Case Management Conference and Motions Hearing held on 3/15/2018. Motions are taken under submission. Court will issue order. FTR Time: 3:43-4:24. Plaintiffs' Attorney: Jill Kahn (Phone). Defendant's Attorney: William Woolman. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 3/15/2018)
March 14, 2018 Filing 93 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (of Deandre Stovall) (Kahn, Jill) (Filed on 3/14/2018)
March 13, 2018 Filing 92 ADR Remark: ADR Phone Conference held on 3/13/2018 by Tamara Lange. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2018) (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)
March 13, 2018 Filing 91 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Woolman, William) (Filed on 3/13/2018)
March 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 90 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #88 Motion to Appear by Telephone. Parties are to make arrangements through CourtCall. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2018)
March 12, 2018 Filing 89 MOTION for Summary Judgment or in the alternative summary adjudication filed by Credico (USA) LLC. Motion Hearing set for 4/19/2018 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 3/26/2018. Replies due by 4/2/2018. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Greta Williams, #2 Declaration Declaration of Jennifer Clark, #3 Proposed Order)(Woolman, William) (Filed on 3/12/2018)
March 12, 2018 Filing 88 MOTION to Appear by Telephone (Attorney Jill Kahn) filed by Valerie Morales, Crystal Hamilton Peterson, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Attorney Jill Kahn to Appear by Telephone)(Kahn, Jill) (Filed on 3/12/2018)
March 8, 2018 Filing 87 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT Updated Joint Case Management Statement filed by Credico (USA) LLC. (Woolman, William) (Filed on 3/8/2018)
March 8, 2018 Filing 86 REPLY (re #75 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, or in the Alternative, to Stay the Proceedings Pending Decision of the United States Supreme Court and to Stay this Litigation in its Entirety to Pending Arbitration ) filed byCredico (USA) LLC. (Woolman, William) (Filed on 3/8/2018)
March 6, 2018 Filing 85 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options of Crystal Hamilton (Kahn, Jill) (Filed on 3/6/2018)
March 6, 2018 Filing 84 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING TIME FOR CMC AND MOTIONS: Initial Case Management Conference and Motions set for 3/15/2018 are reset to 2:30 p.m. in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2018)
March 5, 2018 Filing 83 ADR Clerk's Notice Setting ADR Phone Conference on March 13, 2018 at 3:00 PM Pacific time. Please note that you must be logged into an ECF account of counsel of record in order to view this document. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2018)
March 5, 2018 Filing 82 NOTICE of need for ADR Phone Conference (ADR L.R. 3-5 d) (Kahn, Jill) (Filed on 3/5/2018)
March 1, 2018 Filing 81 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #75 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, or in the Alternative, to Stay the Proceedings Pending Decision of the United States Supreme Court and to Stay this Litigation in its Entirety to Pending Arbitration ) filed byValerie Morales, Crystal Hamilton Peterson, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall. (Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 3/1/2018)
February 27, 2018 Filing 80 ADR Clerk's Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order (ewh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2018)
February 22, 2018 Filing 79 REPLY (re #56 MOTION to Certify Class ) Plaintiffs' Reply in Further Support of Motion for Notice To Be Issued to Similarly Situated Employees filed byValerie Morales, Crystal Hamilton Peterson, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Vasto Order)(Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 2/22/2018)
February 16, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 78 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #77 Stipulation for Enlargement of Time to File Plaintiff's Opposition to Credico (USA) LLC's Motion to Compel Arbitration. Plaintiff's opposition due by 3/1/2018. Credico's reply due by 3/8/2018. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2018)
February 16, 2018 Filing 77 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER (Joint) For Enlargement of Time to File Plaintiffs' Opposition to Credico (USA) LLC's Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Valerie Morales, Crystal Hamilton Peterson, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jill Kahn)(Kahn, Jill) (Filed on 2/16/2018)
February 8, 2018 Filing 76 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #56 MOTION to Certify Class ) filed byCredico (USA) LLC. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Request for Judicial Notice ISO Opposition to Motion for Notice to Be Issued)(Woolman, William) (Filed on 2/8/2018)
February 8, 2018 Filing 75 MOTION to Compel Arbitration, or in the Alternative, to Stay the Proceedings Pending Decision of the United States Supreme Court and to Stay this Litigation in its Entirety to Pending Arbitration filed by Credico (USA) LLC. Motion Hearing set for 3/15/2018 08:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom C, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 2/22/2018. Replies due by 3/1/2018. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Travis Clater in support of Motion to Compel Arbitration, #2 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Compel Arbitration)(Woolman, William) (Filed on 2/8/2018)
January 29, 2018 Filing 74 Supplemental Brief re #40 Opposition/Response to Motion filed byValerie Morales, Crystal Hamilton Peterson, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall. (Related document(s) #40 ) (Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 1/29/2018)
January 29, 2018 Filing 73 Supplemental Brief re #72 Order on Stipulation,,, filed byCredico (USA) LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of William M. Woolman)(Related document(s) #72 ) (Woolman, William) (Filed on 1/29/2018)
January 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 72 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #71 Stipulation to Continue Upcoming Deadlines, Hearings and Case Management Conference. Initial Case Management Conference reset from 2/15/2018 to 3/15/2018 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 3/8/2018. Motion Hearings as to #38 Motion to Dismiss and #56 Motion for Notice to be Issued to Similarly Situated Employees pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(B) are reset from 2/15/2018 to 3/15/2018, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. The parties' supplemental briefs due 01/29/2018. Credico's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Notice to be Issued due by 02/08/2018. Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Notice to be Issued due by 2/22/2018.(ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2018)
January 10, 2018 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #38 MOTION to Dismiss , Transfer, or Stay Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and #56 MOTION to Certify Class . Motions Hearing set for 3/15/2018 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 2/8/2018. Replies due by 2/22/2018. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/10/2018)
January 10, 2018 Filing 71 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Upcoming Deadlines, Hearings, and Case Management Conference filed by Credico (USA) LLC. (Woolman, William) (Filed on 1/10/2018)
November 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 70 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #69 Stipulation to Continue Upcoming Deadlines, Hearings, and Case Management Conference. Initial Case Management Conference reset from 12/14/2017 to 2/15/2018, at 11:00 AM. Motion Hearings as to #38 Motion to Dismiss and #56 Motion for Notice to be Issued to Similarly Situated Employees pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(B) are reset from 12/14/2017 to 2/15/2018, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. The parties' supplemental briefs due 01/11/2018. Credico's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Notice to be Issued due by 1/18/2018. Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Motion for Notice to be Issued due by 2/1/2018. (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2017)
November 21, 2017 Filing 69 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Upcoming Deadlines (Joint) filed by Valerie Morales, Crystal Hamilton Peterson, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall. (Kahn, Jill) (Filed on 11/21/2017)
November 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER.The court issues this scheduling order, which supersedes the clerk's notice at ECF No. 67.The parties need not file a stipulated briefing schedule. The court adopts the parties' schedule in their joint statement at ECF No. 66 with one change: the final reply brief on the Motion for Notice is due December 7, 2017 (a Thursday) as opposed to the parties' choice of December 8, 2017. This results in the following schedule. (1) For the motion to dismiss, transfer, or stay the case, the parties may submit joint supplemental briefing limited to fifteen pages each by December 1, 2017, to address the decisions in Vasto v. Credico and Martin v. Sprint. (2) For the Motion for Notice, Credico's opposition is due November 28, 2017, and the plaintiffs' reply is due December 7, 2017.The hearing on all matters will be on December 14, 2017, at 9:30 a.m. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 11/8/2017)
November 8, 2017 Set Deadlines/Hearings: The court resets the time of all scheduled matters to 12/14/2017 at 9:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 11/8/2017)
November 7, 2017 Filing 67 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING MOTION HEARINGS AND RESCHEDULING TIME OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Initial Case Management Conference is reset for 12/14/2017, from 11:00 AM to 09:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Motion Hearings as to #38 Motion to Dismiss and #56 Motion for Notice to be Issued to Similarly Situated Employees pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(B) are set for 12/14/2017, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Court asks parties to file a stipulated briefing schedule regarding the above motions. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ejkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/7/2017)
November 6, 2017 Filing 66 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Credico (USA) LLC. (Woolman, William) (Filed on 11/6/2017)
October 30, 2017 Filing 65 NOTICE by Credico (USA) LLC re 59 Order, of Entry of SDNY Order (Woolman, William) (Filed on 10/30/2017)
September 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER Setting Case Management Conference for 12/14/2017 11:00 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco and adopting the parties' proposal. The court grants the stipulation and adopts the parties' proposal. The court sets a case-management conference in December as a calendaring device. The parties can reset it as part of their briefing schedule. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 9/28/2017)
September 28, 2017 Filing 63 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Valerie Morales, Crystal Hamilton Peterson, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Kahn, Jill) (Filed on 9/28/2017)
September 22, 2017 Filing 62 CLERK'S NOTICE Rescheduling Case Management Conference. The case management conference previously noticed for 9/28/2017 is reset for 10/5/2017, at 09:30 AM to be heard with the motion hearings. Case Management Statement due by 9/28/2017. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/22/2017)
September 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 61 Order finding as moot #34 Motion to Relate Case entered by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)
August 24, 2017 Filing 60 NOTICE by Valerie Morales, Crystal Hamilton Peterson, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall of Filing Opt-In Consent Forms (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 8/24/2017)
August 24, 2017 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #34 MOTION to Relate Case (Renewed) Scott v. Sprint Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-02846-EMC, #38 MOTION to Dismiss , Transfer, or Stay Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Motion Hearing set for 10/5/2017 09:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2017)
August 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER.The court asks the parties to file a copy of the SDNY order on this court's docket as soon as the order is filed (because the court will not otherwise get an electronic notification about the order). Then, within one week after the filing, the parties must submit their proposed briefing schedule for all pending motions that are not fully briefed. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 8/23/2017)
August 17, 2017 Filing 58 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler:Motion Hearing held on 8/17/2017 re #38 MOTION to Dismiss , Transfer, or Stay Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by Credico (USA) LLC. The hearing on the motion for class certification (ECF No. 56) will remain on calendar for October 5. The case (including briefing) is stayed, which suspends your obligations. The parties agree to equitable tolling of the statute of limitations. Digital FTR Time: 12:32 - 12:52. Plaintiff's Attorneys: Harold Lichten (phone), Jill Kahn (phone). Defendant's Attorney: William Woolman. This is a text-only Minute Entry. There is no pdf image associated with this entry. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 8/17/2017)
August 17, 2017 Filing 57 CLERK'S NOTICE RESCHEDULING TIME OF MOTION HEARING: The court has an unexpected conflict, apologizes to the parties, and needs to continue #38 MOTION to Dismiss , Transfer, or Stay Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. from 8/17/2017 at 9:00 a.m. to 8/17/2017 at 11:30 am. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2017)
August 16, 2017 Filing 56 MOTION to Certify Class filed by Valerie Morales, Crystal Hamilton Peterson, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall. Motion Hearing set for 10/5/2017 09:30 AM in Courtroom 15, 18th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 8/30/2017. Replies due by 9/6/2017. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit Exhibit K)(Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 8/16/2017)
August 16, 2017 Filing 55 NOTICE by Valerie Morales, Crystal Hamilton Peterson, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall of Filing Opt-in Forms (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Opt-in Forms)(Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 8/16/2017)
August 15, 2017 Filing 54 NOTICE of Appearance by Ian B. Wieland for Defendant Credico (USA) LLC (Wieland, Ian) (Filed on 8/15/2017)
August 15, 2017 Filing 53 NOTICE of Appearance by Howard Alan Sagaser for Defendant Credico (USA) LLC (Sagaser, Howard) (Filed on 8/15/2017)
August 11, 2017 Filing 52 CLERK'S NOTICE CHANGING TIME OF MOTION HEARING: The Motion to Dismiss which is presently scheduled to begin at 9:30 a.m, shall instead be advanced to 9:00 a.m. Motion to Dismiss Hearing now set for 8/17/2017 at 09:00 am, in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Extra Note: Counsel Harold Lichten should alert CourtCall of the new time of hearing, as he is appearing by telephone. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2017)
August 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER re #50 Notice of Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel for Defendant CREDICO (USA) LLC. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 08/10/2017. (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2017)
August 9, 2017 Filing 50 NOTICE of Substitution of Counsel by William Martin Woolman and [Proposed] Order (Woolman, William) (Filed on 8/9/2017)
August 9, 2017 Filing 49 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Credico (USA) LLC. Filed byMante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall, Valerie Morales. (Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 8/9/2017)
August 9, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 48 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #47 Stipulation Regarding Filing of Second Amended Complaint.(tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2017)
August 8, 2017 Filing 47 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Filing of Second Amended Complaint filed by Valerie Morales, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Second Amended Complaint)(Kahn, Jill) (Filed on 8/8/2017)
July 31, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 46 Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #45 Motion to Appear by Telephone. Parties are to contact CourtCall to make arrangements. (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2017)
July 31, 2017 Filing 45 MOTION to Appear by Telephone filed by Valerie Morales, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall. (Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 7/31/2017)
July 28, 2017 Filing 44 CLERK'S NOTICE Rescheduling Motion Hearing and Case Management Conference. At the parties request the hearing on #38 MOTION to Dismiss, Transfer, or Stay Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is reset from 8/10/2017, to 8/17/2017, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco and the CMC is reset from 9/21/2017, to 9/28/2017, at 11:00 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 9/21/2017. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2017)
July 26, 2017 Filing 43 CLERK'S NOTICE RESETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE: Initial Case Management Conference reset for 9/21/2017 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 9/14/2017. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (afmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2017)
July 21, 2017 Filing 42 REPLY (re #38 MOTION to Dismiss , Transfer, or Stay Plaintiff's Amended Complaint ) filed byCredico (USA) LLC. (Brass, Rachel) (Filed on 7/21/2017)
July 20, 2017 Filing 41 NOTICE by Valerie Morales, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall of filing Opt In Consent Form (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Opt In Form)(Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 7/20/2017)
July 14, 2017 Filing 40 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #38 MOTION to Dismiss , Transfer, or Stay Plaintiff's Amended Complaint ) filed byValerie Morales, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall. (Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 7/14/2017)
July 7, 2017 Filing 39 NOTICE of Appearance by Shannon Liss-Riordan (Liss-Riordan, Shannon) (Filed on 7/7/2017)
June 30, 2017 Filing 38 MOTION to Dismiss , Transfer, or Stay Plaintiff's Amended Complaint filed by Credico (USA) LLC. Motion Hearing set for 8/10/2017 09:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 7/14/2017. Replies due by 7/21/2017. (Attachments: #1 Declaration R. Brass, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Exhibit H, #10 Exhibit I, #11 Exhibit J, #12 Exhibit K, #13 Exhibit L, #14 Exhibit M, #15 Exhibit N, #16 Exhibit O, #17 Exhibit P, #18 Exhibit Q, #19 Exhibit R, #20 Exhibit S, #21 Exhibit T, #22 Exhibit U, #23 Exhibit V, #24 Exhibit W, #25 Proposed Order)(Brass, Rachel) (Filed on 6/30/2017)
June 23, 2017 Filing 37 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #34 MOTION to Relate Case (Renewed) Scott v. Sprint Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-02846-EMC ) filed byTashian Scott. (Sencer, Caren) (Filed on 6/23/2017)
June 23, 2017 Filing 36 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #34 MOTION to Relate Case (Renewed) Scott v. Sprint Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-02846-EMC ) filed byValerie Morales, Mante Rodriguez, Deandre Stovall. (Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 6/23/2017)
June 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER.The court will wait the customary four days before ruling on the renewed administrative motion to relate the cases. The court issues this entry to point out the procedural context and to ask the parties to confer about their next steps before the Scott plaintiff files the response to the renewed motion. As the parties know, relating the cases ordinarily results in the reassignment of the high-numbered case to the judge in the low-numbered case. And as the parties also know, the low-numbered case here has the parties' consent to the undersigned's jurisdiction; the high-numbered case does not because it is assigned to a district judge. Thus, if the cases are related, then declination after relating the case could affect the case assessment because declination ordinarily results in a random reassignment. The court also observes that if the cases really are related, they should be before the same judge (although there are alternatives to that approach too). In any event, the court will defer its decision until it receives the response to the motion. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 6/20/2017)
June 19, 2017 Filing 34 MOTION to Relate Case (Renewed) Scott v. Sprint Corporation, et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-02846-EMC filed by Credico (USA) LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration R. Brass, #2 Proposed Order)(Brass, Rachel) (Filed on 6/19/2017)
June 13, 2017 Filing 33 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Credico (USA) LLC. Filed byMante Rodriguez, Valerie Morales. (Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 6/13/2017)
June 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 32 Order finding as moot #19 Motion to Dismiss entered by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. In light of the parties' stipulation at ECF No. 31, the court terminates the motion now calendared for 6/29/2017. If Credico relies on its previous motion (as opposed to filing an answer or a new motion to dismiss), it may re-notice its earlier motion by filing a one-page notice that cross-references its earlier motion and sets it for a hearing on the ordinary five-week briefing schedule for any Thursday at 9:30 a.m. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)
June 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 31 Order signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #30 STIPULATION REGARDING FILING OF AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANT CREDICO (USA) LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS, TRANSFER, OR STAY. (rxmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/2/2017)
June 2, 2017 Filing 30 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Filing of Amended Complaint and Defendant Credico's Motion to Dismiss filed by Valerie Morales, Mante Rodriguez. (Kahn, Jill) (Filed on 6/2/2017)
May 31, 2017 Filing 29 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #23 MOTION to Relate Case ) filed byTashian Scott. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Caren P. Sencer in Support of Opposition to Credico (USA), LLC's Administrative Motion to Relate Cases)(Sencer, Caren) (Filed on 5/31/2017)
May 30, 2017 Filing 28 NOTICE of Change In Counsel by Harold Lichten Removing Michael Freedman as counsel of record and entering Matthew Carlson (Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 5/30/2017)
May 30, 2017 Filing 27 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #23 MOTION to Relate Case ) filed byValerie Morales, Mante Rodriguez. (Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 5/30/2017)
May 30, 2017 Filing 26 Certificate of Interested Entities by Credico (USA) LLC identifying Corporate Parent Credico Holdings, Ltd. for Credico (USA) LLC. (Brass, Rachel) (Filed on 5/30/2017)
May 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER regarding ECF No. 23 and service on the non-appearing defendants. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 5/26/2017. (lblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2017)
May 25, 2017 Filing 24 Declaration of Rachel S. Brass in Support of #23 MOTION to Relate Case filed byCredico (USA) LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Related document(s) #23 ) (Brass, Rachel) (Filed on 5/25/2017)
May 25, 2017 Filing 23 MOTION to Relate Case filed by Credico (USA) LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Brass, Rachel) (Filed on 5/25/2017)
May 24, 2017 Filing 22 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Credico (USA) LLC.. (Brass, Rachel) (Filed on 5/24/2017)
May 23, 2017 Filing 21 CLERK'S NOTICE RESCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. In light of the Motion Hearing set for 6/29/2017, the court resets the Case Management Conference previously noticed on 6/8/2017 to 8/24/2017 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Case Management Statement due by 8/17/2017. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (rxmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2017)
May 23, 2017 Filing 20 Declaration of Rachel S. Brass in Support of #19 MOTION to Dismiss , Transfer, or Stay filed byCredico (USA) LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit V)(Related document(s) #19 ) (Brass, Rachel) (Filed on 5/23/2017)
May 23, 2017 Filing 19 MOTION to Dismiss , Transfer, or Stay filed by Credico (USA) LLC. Motion Hearing set for 6/29/2017 09:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 6/6/2017. Replies due by 6/13/2017. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Brass, Rachel) (Filed on 5/23/2017)
May 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Order signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #15 STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME WITHIN WHICH TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING. (rxmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2017)
May 19, 2017 Filing 17 NOTICE filed by Valerie Morales, Mante Rodriguez of filing Opt In Consent Form (Attachments: #(1) Exhibit A - Opt In Form)(Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 5/19/2017)
May 19, 2017 Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge Consent/Declination due by 6/2/2017. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (rxmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2017)
May 19, 2017 Filing 15 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Extending Time Within Which To File A Responsive Pleading filed by Credico (USA) LLC. (Brass, Rachel) (Filed on 5/19/2017)
May 19, 2017 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel S. Brass (Brass, Rachel) (Filed on 5/19/2017)
April 3, 2017 Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Mante Rodriguez, Valerie Morales. Service waived by Credico (USA) LLC waiver sent on 3/28/2017, answer due 5/30/2017. (Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 4/3/2017)
March 27, 2017 Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Valerie Morales, Mante Rodriguez.. (Freedman, Michael) (Filed on 3/27/2017)
March 27, 2017 Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge Consent/Declination due by 4/10/2017. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (rxmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2017)
March 23, 2017 Filing 10 Summons Issued as to Red Tower Marketing, Inc., Diana Rojas. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(farS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2017)
March 22, 2017 Filing 9 Proposed Summons. (Freedman, Michael) (Filed on 3/22/2017)
March 22, 2017 Filing 8 Proposed Summons. (Freedman, Michael) (Filed on 3/22/2017)
March 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Order signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #5 APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE. (rxmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2017)
March 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Order signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #4 APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE. (rxmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2017)
March 16, 2017 Filing 5 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-11236675.) filed by Valerie Morales, Mante Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Certificate of Good Standing)(Kahn, Jill) (Filed on 3/16/2017)
March 16, 2017 Filing 4 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-11236670.) filed by Valerie Morales, Mante Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Certificate of Good Standing)(Lichten, Harold) (Filed on 3/16/2017)
March 9, 2017 Filing 3 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 6/1/2017. Case Management Conference set for 6/8/2017 11:00 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. (farS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2017)
March 8, 2017 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 3/22/2017. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2017)
March 8, 2017 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-11215998.). Filed byMante Rodriguez, Valerie Morales. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Freedman, Michael) (Filed on 3/8/2017)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez et al v. Credico (USA) LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mante Rodriguez
Represented By: Jill Stephanie Kahn
Represented By: Shannon Liss-Riordan
Represented By: Harold Lichten
Represented By: Michael Louis Freedman
Represented By: Matthew David Carlson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Crystal Hamilton Peterson
Represented By: Jill Stephanie Kahn
Represented By: Shannon Liss-Riordan
Represented By: Harold Lichten
Represented By: Matthew David Carlson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Valerie Morales
Represented By: Jill Stephanie Kahn
Represented By: Shannon Liss-Riordan
Represented By: Harold Lichten
Represented By: Michael Louis Freedman
Represented By: Matthew David Carlson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Deandre Stovall
Represented By: Jill Stephanie Kahn
Represented By: Shannon Liss-Riordan
Represented By: Harold Lichten
Represented By: Matthew David Carlson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Credico (USA) LLC
Represented By: Rachel S. Brass
Represented By: Ian B. Wieland
Represented By: Howard Alan Sagaser
Represented By: William Martin Woolman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Red Tower Marketing, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diana Rojas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Tashian Scott
Represented By: Caren P. Sencer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?