Aurionpro Solutions, Inc. v. Saicon Consultants, Inc.

Plaintiff: Aurionpro Solutions, Inc.
Defendant: Saicon Consultants, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2017cv01951
Filed: April 7, 2017
Court: California Northern District Court
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Contra Costa
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28:1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 25, 2017 29 Opinion or Order of the Court STIPULATION AND ORDER re 28 RE PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR STANDARD LITIGATION filed by Saicon Consultants, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/25/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2017)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Aurionpro Solutions, Inc. v. Saicon Consultants, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Aurionpro Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Jonathan Rath Doolittle
Represented By: Timothy Lewis Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Saicon Consultants, Inc.
Represented By: Jonathan Walcom Black
Represented By: David Alexander Grant
Represented By: Benjamin Avery Nix
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?