Kelly v. Worth Holdings, LLC et al
| Thomas Kelly |
| Worth Holdings, LLC and E.S. West Coast, LLC |
| 4:2017cv02466 |
| May 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Sonoma |
| Edward M. Chen |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
53
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen granting 52 Discovery Letter Brief. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2018)
|
|
Filing
50
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 49 TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO COMPLETE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE filed by Thomas Kelly. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/31/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2018)
|
|
Filing
38
STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER <I Stipulated Protective Order filed by Worth Holdings, LLC, E.S. West Coast, LLC. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/23/18. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/23/2018)
|
|
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 29 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES filed by Thomas Kelly. Case Management Statement due by 12/14/2017. Further Case Management Conference reset for 12/21/2017 10:30 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/27/17. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2017)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Granting in Part and Denying in Part 13 Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
