Mason v. MediFit Corporate Services, Inc., et al
Sheila Mason |
MediFit Corporate Services, Inc. dba EXOS and Joleen MacKay |
3:2017cv02542 |
May 3, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Contra Costa |
Jon S. Tigar |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting 43 Motion to Dismiss. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2018) |
Filing 51 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 50 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER re 43 MOTION to Dismiss [Motion to Enforce Settlement and Dismiss Lawsuit] filed by Sheila Mason. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 8, 2018. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2018) |
Filing 49 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 48 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Hearing on Defendant's Motion to Enforce Settlement and Dismiss Lawsuit filed by MediFit Corporate Services, Inc. dba EXOS. 43 MOTION to Dismiss [Mo tion to Enforce Settlement and Dismiss Lawsuit]. Motion Hearing set for 4/5/2018 at 2:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 9, 19th Floor before Judge Jon S. Tigar. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 6, 2018. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/6/2018) |
Filing 39 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 38 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by MediFit Corporate Services, Inc. dba EXOS filed by MediFit Corporate Services, Inc. dba EXOS. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on August 11, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/11/2017) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.