Kao v. Abbott Laboratories Inc. et al
| Crystal Kao and Nina Barwick |
| Abbott Laboratories Inc. |
| 3:2017cv02790 |
| May 15, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Jon S. Tigar |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 60 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order filed by Abbott Laboratories Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on March 25, 2019. (wsnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/25/2019)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS AND STAYING CASE UNDER PRIMARY JURISDICTION DOCTRINE by Judge Jon S. Tigar granting in part and denying in part 21 Motion to Dismiss. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2017)
|
|
Filing
41
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO EXCHANGE INITIAL DISCLOSURES re 40 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Abbott Laboratories Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 5, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2017)
|
|
Filing
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 27 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Nina Barwick, Crystal Kao. Case Management Statement due by 9/14/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/21/2017 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 9, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 31, 2017. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
