Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America v. Coyle/Reno Joint Venture et al
| Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, a Connecticut Corporation |
| Coyle/Reno Joint Venture, Coyle Residential, Inc., Reno Contracting, Inc., Patrick Coyle and Matthew Reno |
| 3:2017cv03141 |
| May 31, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting 56 Motion for Summary Judgment. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2018)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment. Joint Case Management Statement due by 7/12/2018. Further Case Management Conference set for 7/19/2018 at 1:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/9/2018)
|
|
Filing
25
PRETRIAL ORDER.Pretrial Conference set for 8/6/2018 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Bench Trial set for 9/4/2018 to 9/10/2018 at 08:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 9/6/2017. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
