Reynolds v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
Richard Lance Reynolds |
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and J. Merenda |
1:2017cv04202 |
July 24, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Eureka Office |
Fresno |
PSLC AGB |
Nandor J. Vadas |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 39 JUDGMENT (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 6/8/2020)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) |
Filing 34 Report of Pro Se Prisoner Early Settlement Proceeding. Signed by Judge Robert M. Illman on 1/24/2020. The deputy clerk hereby certifies that on 1/24/2020 a copy of this Order was served by sending it via first-class mail to the address of each non-CM/ECF user listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing. (glmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2020) Modified on 1/24/2020 (glmS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 29 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT granting 27 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 11/12/2019) |
Filing 19 ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE ADDRESS FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS ON DEFENDANT (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 8/23/2018) |
Filing 14 ORDER FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS ON ONE DEFENDANT (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/27/2018) |
Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 12/18/2017) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.