Optrics Inc v. Barracuda Networks Inc
| Optrics Inc |
| Barracuda Networks Inc |
| 3:2017cv04977 |
| August 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Richard Seeborg |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
383
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 382 OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/12/2021. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2021)
|
|
Filing
363
ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting 234 Motion for Sanctions. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2021)
|
|
Filing
358
STANDBY ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 3/4/2021 at 01:30 PM. Show Cause Response due by 2/25/2021. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/25/2021. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/25/2021)
|
|
Filing
346
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 345 Order Entering Stay of Case Pending Settlement Except ECF NO. 234 filed by Barracuda Networks Inc. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 7/20/2020. (clS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2020)
|
|
Filing
306
ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson denying 232 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting in part and denying in part 285 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; granting in part and denying in part 296 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. (tshlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2020)
|
|
Filing
219
Discovery Order (tshlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/7/2020)
|
|
Filing
208
Discovery Order re: 189 Discovery Letter Brief Regarding Motion for Protective Order for Rule 30(b)(6) Deposition of Barracuda Networks, Inc. filed by Barracuda Networks Inc, 195 Joint Discovery Letter Brief re 30(b)(6) topics filed by Optrics Inc. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 1/29/2020. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2020)
|
|
Filing
200
Discovery Order re 192 Joint Discovery Letter Brief Re Deposition Scheduling Following Discovery Order, D.I. 180. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 1/23/2020. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2020)
|
|
Filing
188
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 186 Amending Scheduling Order AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT. Jury Selection/Trial set for 11/2/2020 at 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor before Judge Richard Seeborg. Pretrial Conference set for 10/21/2020 at 10:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 03, 17th Floor before Judge Richard Seeborg. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 1/21/2020. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/21/2020)
|
|
Filing
181
Discovery Order re 162 First Discovery Letter Brief Regarding Deposition of David Faugno. The Court orders Mr. Faugno to file a response within 10 days. The Court orders Optrics and Barracuda to each serve Mr. Faugno with a copy of this order immediately and to file a proof of service showing that they have done so. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 1/14/2020. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2020)
|
|
Filing
166
Discovery Order: Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Barracuda Networks Inc (ECF No. 157 ) is DENIED. Further information is required re: ECF Nos. 158-65, as discussed herein. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 1/6/2020. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2020)
|
|
Filing
137
Discovery Order re: 130 Discovery Letter Brief - Joint Discovery Letter re Motion by Barracuda Networks, Inc.'s to Quash or for Protective Order re Optrics Inc.'s Subpoena of Trial Counsel filed by Barracuda Networks Inc. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 10/25/2019. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2019)
|
|
Filing
128
Discovery Order Scheduling meet and confer re 126 Letter, 124 Discovery Letter Brief - Discovery Letter Quashing Subpoena re Nonparty Thoma Bravo LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 10/23/2019. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2019)
|
|
Filing
98
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 96 Amending Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/7/19. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2019)
|
|
Filing
66
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 65 TO CONTINUE CMC FILING DEADLINES. Case Management Statement due by 8/27/2018. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 8/23/18. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2018)
|
|
Filing
33
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 32 to Extend Time to File Amended Complaint and Response and to Continue CMC. Case Management Statement due by 3/15/2018. Initial Case Management Conference previously set for 1/25/2018 continued to 3/22/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/5/17. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/5/2017)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Optrics Inc v. Barracuda Networks Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Barracuda Networks Inc | |
| Represented By: | Karineh Khachatourian |
| Represented By: | Matthew Sean Yungwirth |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Optrics Inc | |
| Represented By: | Herbert Luca Terreri |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
