Uber Technologies, Inc. v. Fetch Media, Ltd.
Uber Technologies, Inc. |
Fetch Media, Ltd. |
4:2017cv05393 |
September 18, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Elizabeth D Laporte |
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED re #33 MOTION to Relate Cases 17-cv-5393-YGR and 18-cv-00015-WHA filed by Fetch Media, Ltd. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/11/2018. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2018) |
Filing 35 Statement of Non-Opposition to Fetch's Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related filed byUber Technologies, Inc.. (Shively, Ashley) (Filed on 1/10/2018) |
Filing 34 ORDER re #32 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Uber Technologies, Inc., ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/3/2018. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2018) |
Filing 33 MOTION to Relate Case filed by Fetch Media, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Olivar, Harry) (Filed on 1/3/2018) |
Filing 32 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice by Uber Technologies, Inc. (Shively, Ashley) (Filed on 12/22/2017) |
Filing 31 ADR Clerk's Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order (ewh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2017) |
Filing 30 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Fetch Media, Ltd. re #27 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Greenberg, Alyssa) (Filed on 12/18/2017) |
Filing 29 NOTICE of Appearance by Alyssa L Greenberg on behalf of Defendant Fetch Media, Ltd. (Greenberg, Alyssa) (Filed on 12/18/2017) |
Filing 28 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and 9(b) filed by Fetch Media, Ltd.. Motion Hearing set for 2/6/2018 02:00 PM in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Responses due by 1/2/2018. Replies due by 1/9/2018. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Olivar, Harry) (Filed on 12/18/2017) |
Filing 27 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss filed by Fetch Media, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Redacted Version of Motion to Dismiss, #4 Unredacted Version of Motion to Dismiss)(Olivar, Harry) (Filed on 12/18/2017) |
Filing 26 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Case Management Statement due by 1/1/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for MONDAY, 1/8/2018 02:00 PM before Judge Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Courtroom 1, 4th Floor, Oakland. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order) (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2017) |
Filing 25 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case Reassigned to Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 12/7/17. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2017) |
Filing 24 Certificate of Interested Entities by Fetch Media, Ltd. identifying Corporate Parent Dentsu Aegis Network Ltd. for Fetch Media, Ltd.. (Olivar, Harry) (Filed on 12/7/2017) |
Filing 23 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2017) |
Filing 22 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Fetch Media, Ltd... (Olivar, Harry) (Filed on 12/6/2017) |
Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Harry Arthur Olivar, Jr (Olivar, Harry) (Filed on 12/6/2017) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by David Morad Elihu (Elihu, David) (Filed on 12/6/2017) |
Filing 19 CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Shively, Ashley) (Filed on 12/5/2017) |
Filing 18 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. Service waived by Fetch Media, Ltd. waiver sent on 9/18/2017, answer due 12/18/2017. (Shively, Ashley) (Filed on 12/4/2017) |
Filing 17 NOTICE by Uber Technologies, Inc. : Notice of Pendency of Other Action or Proceeding (Shively, Ashley) (Filed on 11/21/2017) |
Filing 16 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Uber Technologies, Inc... (Shively, Ashley) (Filed on 11/21/2017) |
Filing 15 CLERK'S NOTICE: The Initial Case Management Conference is rescheduled to 12/12/2017 at 3:00 PM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. The Case Management Statement is due by 12/5/2017. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2017) |
Filing 14 ORDER Granting Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: granting #13 Application.(shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/2/2017) |
Filing 13 MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice KERI S. BRUCE ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-11762465.) filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Bruce, Keri) (Filed on 10/2/2017) Modified on 10/3/2017 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE, Anthony J. Ford by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: Granting #9 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2017) |
Filing 11 ORDER Granting Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: granting #8 Application. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2017) |
Filing 10 ***PLEASE DISREGARD THIS DOCKET ENTERY AS IT WAS FILED IN ERROR*** ORDER Granting Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte: granting #8 Application. (shyS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2017) Modified on 9/27/2017 (shyS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 9 MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice ANTHONY J. FORD ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-11751949.) filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Ford, Anthony) (Filed on 9/27/2017) Modified on 9/28/2017 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 8 MOTION & [PROPOSED] ORDER for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice MARK S. MELODIA ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-11744132.) filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Melodia, Mark) (Filed on 9/25/2017) Modified on 9/28/2017 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Fetch Media, Ltd. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2017) |
Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 12/12/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/19/2017 10:00 AM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 9/18/17. (aaaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2017) |
Filing 5 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/2/2017. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2017) |
Filing 4 Certificate of Interested Entities by Uber Technologies, Inc. (Bovich, John) (Filed on 9/18/2017) |
Filing 3 Proposed Summons. (Bovich, John) (Filed on 9/18/2017) |
Filing 2 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Portions of Complaint and Exhibits filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of John P. Bovich, #2 REDACTED Complaint, #3 UNREDACTED Complaint, #4 Exhibit A - Under Seal, #5 Exhibit B - Under Seal, #6 Exhibit C - Under Seal, #7 Exhibit D - Under Seal, #8 Exhibit E - Under Seal, #9 Exhibit F - Under Seal, #10 Exhibit G - Under Seal, #11 Proposed Order)(Bovich, John) (Filed on 9/18/2017) |
Filing 1 REDACTED VERSION OF DOCUMENTS SOUGHT TO BE SEALED UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. COMPLAINT FOR: 1. BREACH OF CONTRACT; 2. BREACH OF THE IMPLIED COVENANT OF GOOD FAITH AND FAIR DEALING; 3. INTENTIONAL BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY; 4. CONSTRUCTIVE FRAUD; 5. FRAUD; 6. NEGLIGENT MISREPRESENTATION; 7. PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE; 8. NEGLIGENCE; 9. UNFAIR COMPETITION, CAL.BUS.& PROF.CODE 17200, ET SEQ.; 10. UNJUST ENRICHMENT; JURY TRIAL DEMANDED; against Fetch Media, Ltd. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0971-11726041.). Filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bovich, John) (Filed on 9/18/2017) Modified on 9/18/2017 (cv, COURT STAFF). Modified on 9/19/2017 (aaaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.