Supercell Oy v. GREE, Inc. et al
Supercell Oy |
GREE, Inc., Gree International Entertainment, Inc., GREE International, Inc. and Funzio Games, Inc. |
3:2017cv05556 |
September 25, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Outside US |
Sallie Kim |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 96 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL re 95 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Dismissal and Entry of Judgment filed by Gree International Entertainment, Inc., GREE, Inc., Funzio Games, Inc., Supercell Oy. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/12/2019. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2019) |
Filing 76 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 68 Motion to Strike with leave to amend ; denying as moot 74 Discovery Letter Brief. Amended Infringement Contentions due by 8/31/2018. Proposed adjusted pretrial schedule filed by 8/3/2018.(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/1/2018) |
Filing 47 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting motion to dismiss as to the '449 Patent and denying as to the '520 Patent re 26 Motion to Dismiss. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2018) |
Filing 30 STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING OPPOSITION AND REPLY BRIEFING DEADLINES AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND HEARING DATES RE 28 . Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 1/9/2018. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2018) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.