VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel Corporation

Plaintiff: VLSI Technology LLC
Defendant: Intel Corporation
Case Number: 3:2017cv05671
Filed: October 2, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Jose Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Beth Labson Freeman
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2024 Filing 912 ORDER GRANTING 902 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 4/24/2024. (blflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2024)
April 8, 2024 Filing 909 ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS ( 869 , 870 , 875 , 877 , 878 , 879 , 889 , 890 ). Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 4/8/2024. (blflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2024)
April 4, 2024 Filing 908 ORDER GRANTING 868 PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIM (public version of 903 sealed order). Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 3/29/2024. (blflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2024)
February 16, 2024 Filing 854 ORDER GRANTING 809 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND ANSWER (public version of 841 sealed order). Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 2/9/2024. (blflc3, COURT STAFF)(Filed on 2/16/2024)
January 24, 2024 Filing 807 ORDER DENYING 798 REQUEST TO PROCEED TO TRIAL ON AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 1/24/2024. (blflc3, COURT STAFF)(Filed on 1/24/2024)
December 29, 2023 Filing 784 ORDER GRANTING 783 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 12/29/2023. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2023)
December 14, 2023 Filing 778 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART VLSI'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART INTEL'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (public redacted version of sealed order filed at 772 ). Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 12/7/2023. (blflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2023)
October 23, 2023 Filing 763 ORDER DENYING 652 VLSI'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE (public redacted version of sealed order filed at 722 ). Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 10/23/2023. (blflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2023)
October 16, 2023 Filing 732 ORDER GRANTING 698 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 10/16/2023. (blflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2023)
September 26, 2023 Filing 691 ORDER GRANTING 653 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY'S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 9/26/2023. (blflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2023)
September 18, 2023 Filing 659 ORDER GRANTING 584 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY'S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED; DENYING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS ( 581 , 582 , 583 , 585 ) TO CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER PARTY'S MATERIAL SHOULD BE SEALED. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 9/18/2023. (blflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2023)
September 7, 2023 Filing 637 ORDER GRANTING 579 , 591 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO SEAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 9/7/2023. (blflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2023) (blflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2023)
September 5, 2023 Filing 616 ORDER GRANTING 559 563 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 9/5/2023. (blflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2023)
August 29, 2023 Filing 602 ORDER DENYING JOINT ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO EXTEND DEADLINES PURSUANTTO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 79-5(F)(3) (Addressing 600 , 601 ). Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 8/29/2023. (blflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/29/2023)
August 21, 2023 Filing 577 ORDER DENYING 536 543 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL; GRANTING 557 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 8/21/2023. (blflc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/21/2023)
March 6, 2023 Filing 420 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Dkt. No. 393, VLSI's motion to further amend infringement contentions. (Cousins, Nathanael) (Filed on 3/6/2023)
December 22, 2021 Filing 339 ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS 331 , 332 , 335 , 336 RE: SEALING OF EXHIBIT 9 TO INTEL CORPORATION'S 334 AMENDED ANSWER. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 12/22/2021. (blflc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2021)
February 15, 2019 Filing 241 ORDER CONSTRUING CLAIMS IN U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,675,806; 7,709,303; 8,004,922; 8,020,014; 8,268,672; 8,566,836. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 2/15/2019. (blflc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2019)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: VLSI Technology LLC
Represented By: Craig Y. Allison
Represented By: John D. Beynon
Represented By: Henry C. Bunsow
Represented By: Denise M. De Mory
Represented By: Dino Hadzibegovic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Intel Corporation
Represented By: Liv Leila Herriot
Represented By: Evelyn Chi-Lin Mak
Represented By: David Charles Marcus
Represented By: Mark Daniel Selwyn
Represented By: Sharchun Dennis Wang
Represented By: Kathryn Diane Zalewski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?