Wescott v. SC Anderson, Inc. et al
| Carl Alexander Wescott |
| SC Anderson, Inc., Herrig & Vogt, LLP and Moe's Process Serving, Inc. |
| 3:2017cv05676 |
| October 2, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler granting 82 Motion to Dismiss. The court grants the defendants' motion and dismisses Mr. Wescott's complaint with prejudice and without leave to amend. (lblc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2018)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER granting 63 Motion to Dismiss; granting 67 Motion to Dismiss.In the attached order, the court grants the motions to dismiss and dismisses the complaint without prejudice and with leave to amend. The plaintiff must file any amended complaint by August 30, 2018. (Beeler, Laurel) (Filed on 8/9/2018)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler granting 22 Motion to Dismiss and denying 45 Motion to Disqualify. In the attached order, the court grants the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint without prejudice and with leave to amend, and it denies Mr. Wescott's motion to disqualify Herrig & Vogt. Mr. Wescott must file any amended complaint by June 14, 2018. (lblc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
