Karimi v. Golden Gate School of Law et al
| Morteza Benjamin Ray Karimi |
| Golden Gate School of Law and Dean Anthony Niedwiecki |
| 3:2017cv05702 |
| October 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Joseph C. Spero |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
99
ORDER by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero granting 90 Motion for Sanctions and 91 Motion for Summary Judgment. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2019)
|
|
Filing
89
Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero denying 77 Motion for Sanctions and vacating hearing. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/24/2018)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER sealing docket entry 29-18 and setting case management conference to consider 80 objections. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on July 27, 2018. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2018)
|
|
Filing
57
Order by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero denying 18 Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2018)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER re 47 Motion to Continue Mediation. The parties are ordered to confer with the mediator to determine a mutually agreeable date. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero on March 14, 2018. (jcslc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/14/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
