Lance Tuller v. Tintri, Inc. et al
Lance Tuller |
Tintri, Inc., Ken Klein and Ian Halifax |
3:2017cv05714 |
October 4, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Oakland Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 91 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE re Notice of Voluntary Dismissal [Dkt. no. 90]. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/11/2020. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2020) |
Filing 78 ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 69 Motion for Relief from the Stay and Maintaining Stay Against Non-Debtor Defendants. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2018) |
Filing 76 ORDER VACATING September 18, 2018 hearing on 69 MOTION to Determine that the automatic stay has no effect on action against non-debtor co-defendants, and to reset litigation schedule filed by Henrik Thorring, Rustam Mustafin. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 9/12/2018. (ygrlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2018) |
Filing 68 ORDER STAYING ACTION PENDING RESOLUTION OF CHAPTER 11 BANKRUPTCY re 67 Notice (Other) filed by Kieran Harty, Tintri, Inc., Ken Klein, Ian Halifax. Status hearing is set for Friday, 4/12/2019 09:01 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 1, 4th Floor before Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers. Joint filing by 4/5/2019. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/12/2018. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2018) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.