Bunkley-v-Verber et al
| Jeffrey Bunkley |
| Nicholas Verber, Randolph Counsenes and San Mateo County Sheriff's Office |
| 3:2017cv05797 |
| October 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Mateo |
| Jacqueline Scott Corley |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. This case is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/30/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/30/2018)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER GRANTING 16 MOTION TO DISMISS by Judge William H. Orrick. Defendants' motion is GRANTED as to all causes of action in the Complaint, which is DISMISSED. Bunkley may amend the Complaint within 20 days of the date below. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2018)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER ENLARGING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' 16 MOTION TO DISMISS - Response due by 2/6/2018. Reply due by 2/13/2018. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/29/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2018)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER continuing deadlines and hearing date as to 16 MOTION to Dismiss. Response due by 1/30/2018. Reply due by 2/21/2018. Motion Hearing set for 3/7/2018 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Judge William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/05/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
