Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. v. HTC America, Inc. et al
Electronic Scripting Products, Inc. |
HTC America Inc. and Valve Corporation |
3:2017cv05806 |
October 9, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
Alameda |
Jacqueline Scott Corley |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 191 JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge Seeborg on 1/14/2022. (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2022) |
Filing 163 Order by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman granting 162 Stipulation. (rmilc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2021) |
Filing 160 ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION 159 (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/1/2021) |
Filing 156 Order by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman granting 136 Motion to Quash. (rmilc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2021) |
Filing 133 Order by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman granting 130 Discovery Letter Brief. (rmilc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2021) |
Filing 95 Pursuant to the Parties' Stipulation (dkt. 94), the Court grants the agreed upon changes to the Model Protective Order and in turn modifies the undersigned's Order (dkt. 92) to accommodate the Parties' agreement. (rmilc1s, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2020) |
Filing 92 Order by Magistrate Judge Robert M. Illman granting in part and denying in part 87 Discovery Letter Brief. (rmilc1s, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/10/2020) |
Filing 47 ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg Granting 37 Motion to Dismiss. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/16/2018) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.