Estrada v. Ford Motor Company
| Julius Estrada |
| Ford Motor Company and The Ford Store San Leandro |
| 5:2017cv05925 |
| October 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Susan van Keulen |
| Lucy H Koh |
| Donna M Ryu |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case transferred from the Northern District of California has been opened in CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA as case 2:18-cv-00949. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2018) |
| Filing 25 TRANSFER ORDER from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, that the actions listed on Schedule A and pending outside the Central District of California are transferred to the Central District of California to become part of MDL 2814. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2018) |
Filing 24
Order by Judge Lucy H. Koh in case 5:17-cv-05613-LHK; Granting (20) Administrative Motion Stay in case 5:17-cv-05885-LHK.Associated Cases: 5:17-cv-05885-LHK, 5:17-cv-05613-LHK, 5:17-cv-05615-LHK, 5:17-cv-05620-LHK, 5:17-cv-05698-LHK, 5:17-cv-05704-LHK, 5:17-cv-05705-LHK, 5:17-cv-05706-LHK, 5:17-cv-05711-LHK, 5:17-cv-05712-LHK, 5:17-cv-05747-LHK, 5:17-cv-05750-LHK, 5:17-cv-05751-LHK, 5:17-cv-05900-LHK, 5:17-cv-05915-LHK, 5:17-cv-05922-LHK, 5:17-cv-05924-LHK, 5:17-cv-05925-LHK, 5:17-cv-05927-LHK, 5:17-cv-05978-LHK, 5:17-cv-05996-LHK, 5:17-cv-06022-LHK, 5:17-cv-06121-LHK, 5:17-cv-06128-LHK, 5:17-cv-06201-LHK, 5:17-cv-06205-LHK, 5:17-cv-06210-LHK, 5:17-cv-06222-LHK. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2017)
|
| Filing 22 MOTION to Remand To Alameda County Superior Court filed by Julius Estrada. Motion Hearing set for 2/22/2018 01:30 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Judge Lucy H. Koh. Responses due by 11/29/2017. Replies due by 12/6/2017. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points & Authorities, #2 Declaration Rowena Santos, #3 Request For Judicial Notice, #4 Proposed Order)(Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 11/15/2017) |
| Filing 21 **CLERK'S NOTICE FOLLOWING CASE REASSIGNMENT TO THE HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH** Following the case reassignment to Hon. Lucy H. Koh, an Initial Case Management Conference is set for 1/17/2018 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 8, 4th floor, in San Jose, California. A Joint Case Management Conference Statement is due 7-days before the scheduled conference date. See Civil L.R. 16-9 and Civil L.R. 16-10(a). The parties shall familiarize themselves with the Scheduling Notes and Standing Orders for the Hon. Lucy H. Koh: http://cand.uscourts.gov/lhk. (This is a text only docket entry, there is no document associated with this notice.) (iym, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2017) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Lucy H. Koh and Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen for all further proceedings. Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by Executive Committee on 11/14/2017. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2017)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER RELATING CASE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/13/2017. (iym, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2017)
|
| Filing 18 Summons Issued as to The Ford Store San Leandro. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2017) |
| Filing 17 Proposed Summons. (Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 11/3/2017) |
| Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Violation of Statutory Obligations against All Defendants. Filed byJulius Estrada. (Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 11/3/2017) |
|
Filing 15
CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Joint Case Management Statement due by 1/24/2018. Telephonic Case Management Conference set for 1/31/2018 02:45 PM. Signed by Judge Saundra B. Armstrong on 10/25/17. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2017)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 10/25/2017. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/25/2017)
|
| Filing 13 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/24/2017) |
| Filing 12 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Julius Estrada.. (Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 10/24/2017) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Rowena Guillermo Santos (Santos, Rowena) (Filed on 10/19/2017) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ford Motor Company (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 10/18/2017) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company of Notice to State Court Clerk and Adverse Parties of Removal of Entire Action to Federal Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 10/18/2017) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Ford Motor Company of Answer to Complaint, Filed Before Removal (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 10/18/2017) |
| Filing 7 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/10/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/17/2018 01:30 PM. (vlkS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2017) |
| Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 10/30/2017. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/16/2017) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ford Motor Company re #3 Jury Demand, #4 Statement, #1 Notice of Removal, #2 Certificate of Interested Entities (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 10/16/2017) |
| Filing 4 Statement of Disclosure by Ford Motor Company. (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 10/16/2017) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Ford Motor Company. (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 10/16/2017) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ford Motor Company (Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 10/16/2017) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Alameda. Their case number is RG17874483. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-11800830). Filed byFord Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-f to Notice of Removal, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Johnson, Paul) (Filed on 10/16/2017) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
