Asuncion v. CDCR
Plaintiff: Victor Vincent Asuncion
Defendant: CDCR
Case Number: 3:2017cv05970
Filed: October 18, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Kings
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Presiding Judge: PSLC CET
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 23 Order granting 22 Motion for Summary Judgment entered by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. In the attached order, the court grants the CDCR's motion for summary judgment and dismisses the case without prejudice to Mr. Asuncion's filing a new action against the CDCR asserting his ADA/RA claim if he ever properly exhausts his administrative remedies.
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Asuncion v. CDCR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Victor Vincent Asuncion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CDCR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?