Slusher v. Big Lots Stores, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Roxanne Slusher
Defendant: Big Lots F&S, Inc. and Big Lots Stores, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2017cv06020
Filed: October 20, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Contra Costa
Presiding Judge: Jacqueline Scott Corley
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2018 Filing 13 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Amended by Roxanne Slusher (Setareh, Chaim) (Filed on 1/18/2018)
January 18, 2018 Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Roxanne Slusher (Setareh, Chaim) (Filed on 1/18/2018)
January 2, 2018 Filing 11 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Setareh, Chaim) (Filed on 1/2/2018)
December 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley granting #9 Stipulation FOR (1) FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, (2) CONTINUANCE OF DEADLINE TO FILE RULE 26(f) REPORT, ETC., AND (3) CONTINUANCE OF JANUARY 18, 2018 STATUS CONFERENCE. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2017)
December 20, 2017 Set Deadlines/Hearings: Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/22/2018. Initial Case Management Conference reset for 3/1/2018 at 1:30 PM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/20/2017)
December 19, 2017 Filing 9 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER FOR (1) FURTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT, (2) CONTINUANCE OF DEADLINE TO FILE RULE 26(f) REPORT, ETC., AND (3) CONTINUANCE OF JANUARY 18, 2018 STATUS CONFERENCE filed by Big Lots F&S, Inc., Big Lots Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Blythe G. Kochsiek In Support of Joint Stipulation and Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, #2 Proposed Order Granting Joint Stipulation and Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint, etc.)(Kochsiek, Blythe) (Filed on 12/19/2017)
November 22, 2017 Filing 8 STIPULATION TO FURTHER EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [L.R. 6-1(a)] filed by Big Lots F&S, Inc., Big Lots Stores, Inc.. (Kochsiek, Blythe) (Filed on 11/22/2017)
November 3, 2017 Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Big Lots F&S, Inc., Big Lots Stores, Inc... (Kochsiek, Blythe) (Filed on 11/3/2017)
October 27, 2017 Filing 6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT [L.R. 6-1(a)] filed by Big Lots F&S, Inc., Big Lots Stores, Inc.. (Golay, Blythe) (Filed on 10/27/2017)
October 26, 2017 Filing 5 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Roxanne Slusher.. (Setareh, Chaim) (Filed on 10/26/2017)
October 23, 2017 Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 1/11/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/18/2018 01:30 PM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco. (msr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/23/2017)
October 20, 2017 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/3/2017. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2017)
October 20, 2017 Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Big Lots F&S, Inc., Big Lots Stores, Inc. (Golay, Blythe) (Filed on 10/20/2017)
October 20, 2017 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL ACTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1441(a) (Federal Question) from Superior Court, County of Contra Costa. Their case number is C17-01864. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-11815012). Filed byBig Lots F&S, Inc., Big Lots Stores, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Notice of Removal of Civil Action, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Golay, Blythe) (Filed on 10/20/2017)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Slusher v. Big Lots Stores, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Big Lots F&S, Inc.
Represented By: Blythe Leslie Golay
Represented By: Blythe Golay Kochsiek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Big Lots Stores, Inc.
Represented By: Blythe Leslie Golay
Represented By: Blythe Golay Kochsiek
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roxanne Slusher
Represented By: Chaim Shaun Setareh
Represented By: Thomas Alistair Segal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?