Hogan et al v. Shapiro et al
| Clay Hogan and Barbara Hogan |
| Zak Shapiro and Oppenheimer & Co., Inc. |
| 3:2017cv06031 |
| October 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| San Francisco |
| Donna M. Ryu |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Accordingly, the motion to compel arbitration is GRANTED, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice, and defendants' request for attorneys fees is DENIED. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/17/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/17/2018)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ARBITRATION SHOULD NOT BE COMPELLED - If plaintiffs now agree to submit to arbitration, they shall inform the Court of that fact on or before January 16, 2018. If plaintiffs want to proceed with their opposition to the motion to compel, they may file a sur-reply not to exceed two pages on or before January 16, 2018. The January 17, 2018 hearing is VACATED. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 01/09/2018. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/9/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
