Cummings v. Worktap, Inc. et al
| Jonathan Cummings |
| Worktap, Inc., Mark Robinson and David Lee |
| 3:2017cv06246 |
| October 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Oakland Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Saundra Brown Armstrong |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong on 11/8/19. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2019)
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND SUA SPONTE ENTERING SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS MARK ROBINSON AND DAVID LEE by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong: Plaintiffs unopposed administrative motion for leave to file certain e xhibits under seal is GRANTED 99 ; Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendants Mark Robinson and David Lee is DENIED 100 ; and Summary Judgment is entered in favor of the Individual Defendants. By no later than 9/20/2019, Plaintiffs shall file their motion for default judgment as to Worktap. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2019)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR RELIEF FROM MAGISTRATE JUDGES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF ATTACHMENT by Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong. (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
