Ross-Yates v. Unifund CCR Partners
| Chimeka Ross-Yates |
| Does 1-10 and Unifund CCR Partners |
| 3:2017cv06559 |
| November 13, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Alameda |
| Vince Chhabria |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 Acknowledgment of Receipt received from Alameda County Superior Court of remand order and docket sheet. (fabS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2018) |
| Filing 19 CLERK'S NOTICE re remand. (farS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/16/2018) |
Filing 18
ORDER REMANDING CASE to Alameda County Superior Court. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 1/11/2018. The deputy clerk hereby certifies that on 1/12/2018 a copy of this order was served by sending it via first-class mail to the address of each non-CM/ECF user listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing.(vclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2018) Modified on 1/12/2018 (knm, COURT STAFF).
|
| Filing 17 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Vince Chhabria: Show Cause Hearing held on 1/11/2018. The Court orders the case remanded to State Court. FTR Time: 10:23- 10:27. Plaintiff Attorney: No appearance by the plaintiff. Defendant Attorney: Rishi Gupta and Tomio Narita. The deputy clerk hereby certifies that on 1/11/2018 a copy of this order was served by sending it via first-class mail to the address of each non-CM/ECF user listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (knm, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 1/11/2018) |
| Filing 16 ERRATA re #14 Response to Order to Show Cause by Unifund CCR Partners. (Gupta, Rishi) (Filed on 1/8/2018) |
| Filing 15 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Unifund CCR Partners with Exhibit attached. (Gupta, Rishi) (Filed on 1/6/2018) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Unifund CCR Partners . (Gupta, Rishi) (Filed on 1/6/2018) |
| Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Unifund CCR Partners re #12 Order to Show Cause (Gupta, Rishi) (Filed on 1/2/2018) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 1/11/2018 10:00 AM. Show Cause Response due by 1/5/2018. Signed by Judge Vince Chhabria on 12/29/2017. (vclc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2017)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Vince Chhabria for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero no longer assigned to the case. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Signed by the Executive Committee on 12/28/17. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2017)
|
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2017) |
| Filing 9 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Unifund CCR Partners.. (Gupta, Rishi) (Filed on 12/27/2017) |
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Re: Consent or Declination: Plaintiffs/Defendants shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (Party/parties were also notified via telephone or email.) Consent/Declination due by 12/11/2017. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2017) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint byUnifund CCR Partners. (Gupta, Rishi) (Filed on 11/20/2017) |
| Filing 6 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 2/9/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/16/2018 02:00 PM in Courtroom G, 15th Floor, San Francisco. (gbaS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2017) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Unifund CCR Partners of Removal Documents (Gupta, Rishi) (Filed on 11/16/2017) Modified on 11/16/2017 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Unifund CCR Partners (Gupta, Rishi) (Filed on 11/15/2017) |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 11/28/2017. (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2017) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Unifund CCR Partners (Gupta, Rishi) (Filed on 11/14/2017) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda. Their case number is HG17876018. (Filing fee $400.00, receipt number 0971-11872868). Filed by Unifund CCR Partners. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Gupta, Rishi) (Filed on 11/13/2017) Modified on 11/16/2017 (gbaS, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
