Revitch v. Citibank, N.A.
Plaintiff: Jeremiah Revitch
Defendant: Citibank, N.A.
Case Number: 3:2017cv06907
Filed: December 4, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Marin
Presiding Judge: Joseph C. Spero
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 47 U.S.C. ยง 227
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 150 ORDER RE 84 MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION by Judge Alsup. (whalc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/28/2019)
December 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER DENYING 79 MOTION FOR DISCOVERY SANCTIONS by Judge Alsup. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2018)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Revitch v. Citibank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeremiah Revitch
Represented By: Lawrence Timothy Fisher
Represented By: Thomas A. Reyda
Represented By: Joel Dashiell Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Citibank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?