Micron Technology, Inc. v. United Microelectronics Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Micron Technology, Inc.
Defendant: United Microelectronics Corporation and Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Co., Ltd.
Case Number: 3:2017cv06932
Filed: December 5, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: Santa Clara
Presiding Judge: Laurel Beeler
Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1836
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 265 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO LIFT STAY; VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 5, 2021. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/5/2021)
July 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 247 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO STAY. The instant action is stayed pending the resolution of United States v. United Microelectronics Corp., et al., CR 18-465. In light of the stay, the Case Management Conference scheduled for Augus t 23, 2019, is vacated, and defendants' motion to dismiss the SAC, currently noticed for hearing on August 2, 2019, is deemed withdrawn, without prejudice to refiling after the stay is lifted. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on July 11, 2019. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2019)
May 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 199 ORDER DENYING UNITED MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS; GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART JINHUA FUJIAN INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CO.'S MOTION TO DISMISS; AFFORDING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFEREN CE. Count I is dismissed to the extent it is based on an acquisition of trade secrets occurring before May 11, 2016. Counts II, III and IV are dismissed. If Micron wishes to amend, it shall file a Second Amended Complaint no later than May 24, 20 19. The case management conference, currently scheduled for May 24, 2019, is continued to June 7, 2019, at 10:30 a.m. A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than May 31, 2019. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 2, 2019. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2019)
April 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 190 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL EXHIBITS 4, 5, AND 6 TO CLARK DECLARATION; DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 3, 2019. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2019)
January 18, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 139 ORDER GRANTING JINHUA'S MOTION TO DISMISS; AFFORDING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND. The complaint, to the extent asserted against Jinhua, is dismissed. Micron's request for leave to amend is granted, and Micron shall file any amended complaint no later than February 8, 2019. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 18, 2019. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/18/2019)
November 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 136 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SERVE DEFENDANT JINHUA BY ALTERNATIVE MEANS; DEFERRING RULING ON DEFENDANT JINHUA'S MOTION TO DISMISS; VACATING HEARING. The Court defers ruling on Jinhua's motion to dismiss, and Micron' ;s motion to serve Jinhua by alternative means is granted. Micron is afforded leave to serve the summons and complaint on Jinhua by email sent to Jinhua's United States counsel of record, specifically, Daniel Johnson Jr. and Lyle B. Vander Schaaf, said service to be completed no later than December 5, 2018; proof of such service shall be filed no later than December 10, 2018. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on November 20, 2018. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/20/2018)
September 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE MATERIALS UNDER SEAL. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 14, 2018. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/14/2018)
September 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFERRED PORTION OF PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL; DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 13, 2018. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2018)
August 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER GRANTING IN PART, DENYING IN PART, AND DEFERRING IN PART RULING ON PLAINTIFF'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL; DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 27, 2018. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2018)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Micron Technology, Inc. v. United Microelectronics Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Micron Technology, Inc.
Represented By: Randall Evan Kay
Represented By: Marcus S. Quintanilla
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United Microelectronics Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Co., Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?