Fernandez et al v. Brink's Incorporated
Ernie Ricardo Fernandez, Gregory Bivens, William C. Carver, George Hernandez, III, Marvin Miles, Jarmaine Mitchell, Sean Mixon and Conrad Nebriaga |
Brink's Incorporated |
3:2017cv07050 |
December 11, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Francisco Office |
San Francisco |
William Alsup |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 32 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL DEADLINES filed by Ernie Ricardo Fernandez Close of Fact Discovery due by 5/10/2019. Dispositive Motion due by 7/9/2019. Designation of Exp erts due by 8/2/2019. Rebuttal Reports due by 8/16/2019. Close of Expert Discovery due by 9/2/2019. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/24/2019 02:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor. Jury Selection set for 10/21/2019 08:30 AM in San F rancisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Jury Trial set for 10/22/2019-10/25/2019 08:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom E, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 12/17/18. (mllS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/17/2018) |
Filing 29 CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 4/9/2018. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2018) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.