Vincent et al v. Ford Motor Company
| Jenni Vincent and Kelly Vincent |
| Ford Motor Company |
| 4:2017cv07127 |
| December 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| Haywood S Gilliam |
| Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case File Successfully Electronically Transferred to the Central District of California, Their Case Number is 2:18-cv-1328. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2018) |
| Filing 12 MDL ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to the Central District of California, MDL #2814. (cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/13/2018) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ford Motor Company (Wierenga, Robert) (Filed on 1/3/2018) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FOR REASSIGNED CIVIL CASE. Notice is hereby given that a Case Management Conference has been set for March 20, 2018, before Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr., at 2:00 p.m., in Courtroom 2, 4th Floor, 1301 Clay Street, Oakland, CA. Case Management Statement due by March 13, 2018. Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2018) |
Filing 9
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Haywood S Gilliam, Jr for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James no longer assigned to the case.. Signed by Executive Committee on 1/2/18. (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2018)
|
| Filing 8 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2017) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ford Motor Company.. (Wierenga, Robert) (Filed on 12/29/2017) |
| Filing 6 *** FILED IN ERROR,REFER TO DOCUMENT #7 *** CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ford Motor Company.. (Wierenga, Robert) (Filed on 12/29/2017) Modified on 12/29/2017 (fff, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 5 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ford Motor Company identifying Other Affiliate State Street Corporation, Other Affiliate Evercore Trust Company, N.A., Other Affiliate BlackRock Inc., Other Affiliate Vanguard Group, The for Ford Motor Company. (Wierenga, Robert) (Filed on 12/18/2017) |
| Filing 4 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/8/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/15/2018 10:00 AM. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2017) Modified on 12/15/2017 (hdjS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/29/2017. (haS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2017) |
| Electronic filing error. This filing will not be processed by the clerks office.Please re-file this document in its entirety and when prompted, enter all association of persons, firms, partnerships, corporations, or other entities that have a financial interest or could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding. Re: #2 Certificate of Interested Entities filed by Ford Motor Company (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2017) |
| Answer to Removed Complaint byFord Motor Company. (hdjS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2017) |
| Filing 2 Certificate of Interested Entities by Ford Motor Company (Wierenga, Robert) (Filed on 12/14/2017) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Napa. Their case number is 17-CV-001271. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-11953769). Filed byFord Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons, #2 Exhibit B - Complaint, #3 Exhibit C - Answer, #4 Exhibit D - Notice of Removal to Adverse Party, #5 Exhibit E - Notice of Removal to Superior Court Clerk, #6 Exhibit F - Danziger Declaration ISO Notice of Removal, #7 Exhibit G - Swaney Declaration ISO Notice of Removal, #8 Demand for Jury Trial, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Wierenga, Robert) (Filed on 12/14/2017) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
