v. William Meaher
| John J. Hurry, Justine Hurry, Investment Services Corporation and BRICFM LLC doing business as Corner of Paradise ice Cream Store |
| Financial Industroy Regulatory Authority, Inc. |
| William Meagher |
| 3:2017mc80026 |
| February 28, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| San Francisco |
| Laurel Beeler |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2017. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
Order denying #16 Discovery Letter Brief entered by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. The court reviewed the plaintiffs' questions and Mr. Meagher's objections, denies the plaintiffs' motion to compel answers, and grants Mr. Meagher's motion to quash. The unanswered questions are aimed only at privileged information or are irrelevant, and the information is protected for the reasons advanced by Mr. Meagher and stated in the court's April 7 order.
|
| Filing 16 Joint Discovery Letter Brief filed by BRICFM LLC, John J. Hurry, Justine Hurry, Investment Services Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Verbatim reproduction of disputed discovery)(Susman, Jordan) (Filed on 4/26/2017) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER by Judge Laurel Beeler granting #1 Motion to Quash. If the plaintiffs want to propound written discovery that is not geared toward privileged information, they may do so within seven days. Mr. Meagher then has seven days to object, and the parties have seven days after that to file a joint letter brief that complies with the courts standard practices for discovery disputes (set forth in the attached standing order). (Attachments: #1 Standing Order)(lblc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2017)
|
| Filing 14 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler: Motion Hearing held on 4/6/2017 re #1 MOTION to Quash filed by William Meagher. Court to issue an Order.FTR Time: 10:02-10:18. Plaintiff's Attorney: Jordan Susman. Defendant's Attorney: Thomas Burke. This is a text-only Minute Entry (rm, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 4/6/2017) |
| Filing 13 REPLY (re #1 MOTION to Quash ) Meagher Subpoena filed byWilliam Meagher. (Attachments: #1 Declaration McNamara Reply Declaration ISO Motion to Quash Meagher Subpoena, #2 Exhibit A to McNamara Reply Declaration ISO Motion to Quash Meagher Subpoena, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Burke, Thomas) (Filed on 3/21/2017) |
| Filing 12 OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re #1 MOTION to Quash ) filed byJohn J. Hurry, Justine Hurry, Investment Services Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jordan Susman, #2 Exhibit 1 to Declaration, #3 Exhibit 2 to Declaration, #4 Exhibit 3 to Declaration, #5 Exhibit 4 to Declaration, #6 Exhibit 5 to Declaration)(Harder, Charles) (Filed on 3/14/2017) |
| Filing 11 CLERK'S NOTICE Setting Motion Hearing as to #1 MOTION to Quash. Motion Hearing set for 4/6/2017, at 09:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Responses due by 3/14/2017. Replies due by 3/21/2017. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tmiS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2017) |
|
Filing 10
Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #8 Motion for Pro Hac Vice. (rxmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2017)
|
|
Filing 9
Order by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler granting #7 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(rxmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/9/2017)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Application of Elizabeth A. McNamara ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-11216109.) filed by William Meagher. (Burke, Thomas) (Filed on 3/8/2017) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice Application of John M. Browning ( Filing fee $ 310, receipt number 0971-11216010.) filed by William Meagher. (Burke, Thomas) (Filed on 3/8/2017) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by William Meagher re #5 Proposed Order, Re Motion to Quash Subpoena (Burke, Thomas) (Filed on 3/1/2017) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Order re #1 Motion to Quash Subpoena Issued from a Civil Case Pending Before the United States District Court for the District of Arizona and Served on Non-Party Journalist William Meagher by William Meagher. (Burke, Thomas) (Filed on 3/1/2017) Modified on 3/2/2017 (ysS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by William Meagher re #3 Declaration in William Meagher, #1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena, #2 Declaration of John M. Browning. (ysS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2017) |
| Filing 3 Declaration of Willaim Meagher in Support of #1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena filed byWilliam Meagher. (Related document(s) #1 ) (ysS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/1/2017: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F) (ysS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 2 Declaration of John M. Browning in Support of #1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena filed byWilliam Meagher. (Related document(s) #1 ) (ysS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2017) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/1/2017: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E) (ysS, COURT STAFF). |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Quash Subpoena Issued from a Civil Case Pending Before the United States District Court for the District of Arizona and Served on Non-Party Journalist William Meagher filed by William Meagher. (Filing Fee $47.00, receipt #34611122532) (Attachments: #1 Receipt)(ysS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/28/2017) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
