LegalForce RAPC Worldwide P.C. et al v. Demassa
LegalForce RAPC Worldwide P.C., LegalForce, Inc. and Raj Abhyanker |
Chris Demassa |
5:2018cv00043 |
January 3, 2018 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
San Jose Office |
Santa Clara |
Howard R. Lloyd |
Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 0045 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 284 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION; FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. DeMassa is entitled to judgment in his favor. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 6, 2021. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2021) |
Filing 228 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVERY; VACATING HEARING. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 9, 2020. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/9/2020) |
Filing 222 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. To the extent plaintiff's Second Claim for Relief is based on (a) unfair and fraudulent business practices, (b) a violation of section 6125, a nd (c) a claim for restitution, the motion is granted. To the extent defendant seeks summary judgment on the Third Claim for Relief, the motion is granted. In all other respects, the motion is denied. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 17, 2020. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/17/2020) |
Filing 192 AMENDED PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 2/21/2020. (tlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/24/2020) |
Filing 180 ORDER APPOINTING COUNSEL. Cat Kim, Joyce Li, Andrew Jones and Galia Amram of Durie Tangri LLP are appointed as counsel for Mr. DeMassa in this matter. Counsel have indicated they anticipate requesting an extension of the trial date, and this o rder is contingent upon that request for an extension being granted. The scope of this referral shall be for all purposes for the duration of the case. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 18, 2020. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2020) |
Filing 149 ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson denying 136 Motion to Rescind Sanctions Order. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2019) |
Filing 132 ORDER by Judge Thomas S. Hixson granting in part and denying in part 118 Motion for Sanctions. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2019) |
Filing 131 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE OR DISMISS DEFENDANT'S ANSWER - $1,666,666 COUNTERCLAIM. Defendant's Answer - $1,666,666 Counterclaim is stricken in its entirety. The answer filed June 21, 2019, as supplemented June 27, 2019, shall remain defendant's operative response to the Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on October 11, 2019. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2019) |
Filing 129 Discovery Order granting 121 Plaintiff's request to modify the existing protective order to allow it to disclose Defendants confidential information to its damages expert. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 10/3/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2019) |
Filing 114 Discovery Order. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 8/30/2019. (tshlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/30/2019) |
Filing 109 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT'S SECOND MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO FILE ELECTRONICALLY. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 20, 2019. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2019) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/20/2019: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (tlS, COURT STAFF). |
Filing 103 ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 99 MOTION for Sanctions and Contempt filed by LegalForce RAPC Worldwide P.C. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 8/12/2019. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2019) |
Filing 86 Discovery Order, Status Report due by 5/21/2019. Signed by Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 5/20/2019. (tshlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2019) |
Filing 81 Discovery Order re Docket No. 79. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson on 4/18/2019. (rmm2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2019) |
Filing 69 PRETRIAL PREPARATION ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 5/10/2019. Close of Expert Discovery due by 11/8/2019. Close of Fact Discovery due by 9/9/2019. Designation of Experts due by 10/7/2019. Dispositive Motion due by 11/22/2019. Rebuttal Repo rts due by 10/18/2019. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/11/2020 03:00 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor. Jury Selection set for 2/24/2020 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor before Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Jury Trial set for 2/24/2020, 2/25/2020, 2/26/2020, 2/27/2020 09:00 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 07, 19th Floor before Judge Maxine M. Chesney. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on 2/8/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order 1, # 2 Standing Order 2)(tlhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2019) |
Filing 53 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; SETTING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. DeMassa shall file an answer, as well as any other responsive pleading, to the First Amended Complaint no later than September 28, 2018. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 7, 2018. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/7/2018) |
Filing 42 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS; VACATING HEARING; SETTING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT TO RESPOND TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT. Defendant shall filed with the Clerk of Court and serve on plaintiff, no later than June 15, 2018, a response to the First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 25, 2018. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/25/2018) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.