Automated Packaging Systems, Inc. v. Free Flow Packaging International, Inc.
Plaintiff: Automated Packaging Systems, Inc.
Defendant: Free Flow Packaging International, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2018cv00356
Filed: January 17, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Office: San Francisco Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Edward M. Chen
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 249 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen denying 246 Motion to Vacate. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2018)
September 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 237 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying 218 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2018)
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 217 ORDER - Claim Construction Order. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/2/2018. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2018)
May 14, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 178 ORDER by Judge Edward M. Chen Denying 164 Plaintiff's Administrative Motion to Seal, and Granting in Part and Denying in Part 168 Defendant's Administrative Motion to Seal. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2018)
April 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 162 ORDER RE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION HEARING. Parties may file reply briefs not to exceed 10 pages by 5/11/18. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on April 27, 2018. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2018)
March 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 146 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Private ADR re 144 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Automated Packaging Systems, Inc. filed by Automated Packaging Systems, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/20/18. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2018)
March 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 142 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 141 Continuing Case Management Conference filed by Free Flow Packaging International, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 4/12/2018. Initial Case Management Conference set for 4/19/2018 09:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 05, 17th Floor. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/1/18. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2018)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Automated Packaging Systems, Inc. v. Free Flow Packaging International, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Automated Packaging Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew W. Alexander
Represented By: Andrew Walton Alexander
Represented By: Kyle Deighan
Represented By: Richard S.J. Hung
Represented By: Tracy Scott Johnson
Represented By: Nenad Pejic
Represented By: Georgia E Yanchar
Represented By: Georgia K.E. Yanchar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Free Flow Packaging International, Inc.
Represented By: Richard G. Frenkel
Represented By: Richard Gregory Frenkel
Represented By: Maximilian A. Grant
Represented By: Maureen P. Long
Represented By: Brett Matthew Sandford
Represented By: Kyle A. Virgien
Represented By: Nicholas H Yu
Represented By: Marc N. Zubick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?