Martin et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
Plaintiff: Charles E Martin and Steven C Day
Defendant: Mossy Ford, Inc. and Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 5:2018cv00405
Filed: January 18, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: Susan van Keulen
Referring Judge: Lucy H Koh
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2018 Case transferred from the Northern District of California has been opened in CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA as case 2:18-cv-01750. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2018)
March 2, 2018 Filing 16 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-2) from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1407, the actions on the attached schedule are transferred to the Central District of California to become part of MDL 2814. (dhmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2018)
February 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Lucy H. Koh for all further proceedings pursuant to Order Relating Cases. This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Judge Beth Labson Freeman no longer assigned to the case. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2018) Modified on 2/16/2018 (sp, COURT STAFF).
February 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER RELATING CASE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 2/5/18. (iym, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2018)
January 31, 2018 Filing 13 JUDICIAL REFERRAL FOR PURPOSES OF DETERMINING RELATIONSHIP OF CASES. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 1/31/2018. (blflc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/31/2018)
January 25, 2018 Filing 12 MOTION to Stay re #11 MOTION to Relate Case to Multidistrict Litigation Case No. 2814 filed by Ford Motor Company. Motion Hearing set for 3/15/2018 09:00 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 3, 5th Floor before Judge Beth Labson Freeman. Responses due by 3/6/2018. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Memorandum ISO Motion to Stay, #2 Proposed Order)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 1/25/2018)
January 25, 2018 Filing 11 MOTION to Relate Case to Multidistrict Litigation Case No. 2814 filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Natalie R. Nuttall ISO, #2 Proposed Order)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 1/25/2018)
January 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Beth Labson Freeman for all further proceedings.This case is assigned to a judge who participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Judge Nathanael M. Cousins remains as referral judge assigned to the case. Reassignment Order signed by Executive Committee on 1/24/2018. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Eligibility for Video Recording)(bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2018)
January 23, 2018 Filing 9 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/23/2018)
January 23, 2018 Filing 8 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ford Motor Company, Mossy Ford, Inc... (Nuttall, Natalie) (Filed on 1/23/2018)
January 22, 2018 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE REGARDING Consent or Declination: All parties shall file a consent or declination to proceed before a magistrate judge by 2/5/2018. Note that any party is free to withhold consent to proceed before a magistrate judge without adverse substantive consequences. The forms are available at: http://cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2018)
January 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Nathanael M. Cousins for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Judge Executive Committee on 1/22/18. (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2018)
January 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 1/19/2018. (hrllc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2018)
January 19, 2018 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 2/2/2018. (srnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2018)
January 19, 2018 Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet by Ford Motor Company Amended Civil Cover Sheet. (Nuttall, Natalie) (Filed on 1/19/2018)
January 18, 2018 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Spencer Peter Hugret Lead and Notice Attorney (Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 1/18/2018)
January 18, 2018 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Monterey County. Their case number is 17CV004554. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-12035608). Filed byMossy Ford, Inc., Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Affidavit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Nuttall, Natalie) (Filed on 1/18/2018)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mossy Ford, Inc.
Represented By: Spencer Peter Hugret
Represented By: Natalie Rea Nuttall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Spencer Peter Hugret
Represented By: Natalie Rea Nuttall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles E Martin
Represented By: Steve Mikhov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Steven C Day
Represented By: Steve Mikhov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?