Cooley v. City of Walnut Creek et al
| Gerald Len Cooley, Jr. |
| City of Walnut Creek and City of Walnut Creek Police Officers |
| 3:2018cv00719 |
| February 1, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of California |
| San Francisco Office |
| Solano |
| Elizabeth D. Laporte |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
206
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 194 Motion for Summary Judgment. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2021)
|
|
Filing
166
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF GERALD COOLEY LEAVE TO FILE A SEVENTH AMENDED COMPLAINT. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/5/2020. (ygrlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2020)
|
|
Filing
143
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore denying 138 Motion for Sanctions. Plaintiff's Declaration due by 12/13/2019. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2019)
|
|
Filing
134
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 117 Motion for Sanctions. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/22/2019)
|
|
Filing
133
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore regarding 121 Joint Discovery Letter Brief re: Defendants Jeha and Leonard. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2019)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore denying Plaintiff's 112 Written request for telephonic conference for the purpose of enforcing the Court's meet and confer requirement. Notwithstanding, the parties are ordered to meet and confer within 7 days of this order. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/30/2019)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore terminating Plaintiff's 106 7/29/2019 Unilateral Discovery Letter Brief. Defendants shall complete their document production within 7 days of this order. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2019)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY DISPUTE re 96 Discovery Letter Brief AND EXHIBITS filed by Gerald Len Cooley, Jr. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 7/24/2019. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2019)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTON FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers; denying without prejudice 97 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2019)
|
|
Filing
93
CASE MANAGEMENT AND PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 6/21/2019. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2019)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 82 Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2019)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 71 Motion for Leave to File the Sixth Amended Complaint; denying 76 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/13/2019)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 53 County of Contra Costa's Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 56 City of Walnut Creek's Motion to Dismiss. Amended Pleadings due by 5/9/2019. Response of Detectives Leonard and Jeha shall be due 14 days after Plaintiff's filing: 5/23/19. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2019)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER RE: DKT. NO. 41 re 41 Letter filed by Gerald Len Cooley, Jr.. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 9/13/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2018)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
